Usage Information
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of burn injuries in older patients is dramatically increasing as the population of older people grows. Despite the increased demand for elderly burn care, the mechanisms that mediate increased morbidity and mortality in older trauma patients are unknown. We recently showed that a burn injury invokes white adipose tissue browning that leads to a substantially increased hypermetabolic response associated with poor outcomes. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of age on the metabolic adipose response of browning after a burn injury.METHOD One hundred and seventy patients with burn injury admitted to the Ross Tilley Burn Centre were prospectively enrolled and grouped by age as older (≥50 years) and young (≤35 years). Adipose tissue and sera were collected and analyzed for browning markers and metabolic state via histology, gene expression, and resting energy expenditure assays.RESULTS We found that older patients with burn injury lacked the adipose browning response, as they showed significant reductions in uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1) expression. This failure of the browning response was associated with reduced whole-body metabolism and decreased survival in older patients with burn injury. Mechanistically, we found that the adipose of both aged patients after burn trauma and aged mice after a burn showed impairments in macrophage infiltration and IL-6, key immunological regulators of the browning process after a severe trauma.CONCLUSION Targeting pathways that activate the browning response represents a potential therapeutic approach to improve outcomes after burn trauma for elderly patients.FUNDING NIH (R01-GM087285-01), Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant no. 123336), and Canada Foundation for Innovation Leaders Opportunity Fund (no. 25407).
Authors
Abdikarim Abdullahi, Carly M. Knuth, Christopher Auger, Thibacg Sivayoganathan, Alexandra Parousis, Marc G. Jeschke
Usage data is cumulative from January 2025 through January 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 577 | 111 |
| 104 | 20 | |
| Figure | 240 | 3 |
| Table | 74 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 129 | 2 |
| Citation downloads | 96 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,220 | 136 |
| Total Views | 1,356 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
