Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Top read articles
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Concise Communication
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Treating ICB-resistant glioma with anti-CD40 and mitotic spindle checkpoint controller BAL101553 (lisavanbulin)
Vassilis Genoud, … , Heidi A. Lane, Paul R. Walker
Vassilis Genoud, … , Heidi A. Lane, Paul R. Walker
Published August 17, 2021
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2021;6(18):e142980. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.142980.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology Oncology

Treating ICB-resistant glioma with anti-CD40 and mitotic spindle checkpoint controller BAL101553 (lisavanbulin)

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Glioblastoma is a highly malignant brain tumor with no curative treatment options, and immune checkpoint blockade has not yet shown major impact. We hypothesized that drugs targeting mitosis might affect the tumor microenvironment and sensitize cancer cells to immunotherapy. We used 2 glioblastoma mouse models with different immunogenicity profiles, GL261 and SB28, to test the efficacy of antineoplastic and immunotherapy combinations. The spindle assembly checkpoint activator BAL101553 (lisavanbulin), agonistic anti-CD40 antibody, and double immune checkpoint blockade (anti–programmed cell death 1 and anti–cytotoxic T lymphocyte–associated protein 4; anti–PD-1 and anti–CTLA-4) were evaluated individually or in combination for treating orthotopic GL261 and SB28 tumors. Genomic and immunological analyses were used to predict and interpret therapy responsiveness. BAL101553 monotherapy increased survival in immune checkpoint blockade–resistant SB28 glioblastoma tumors and synergized with anti-CD40 antibody, in a T cell–independent manner. In contrast, the more immunogenic and highly mutated GL261 model responded best to anti–PD-1 and anti–CTLA-4 therapy and more modestly to BAL101553 and anti-CD40 combination. Our results show that BAL101553 is a promising therapeutic agent for glioblastoma and could synergize with innate immune stimulation. Overall, these data strongly support immune profiling of glioblastoma patients and preclinical testing of combination therapies with appropriate models for particular patient groups.

Authors

Vassilis Genoud, Felipe I. Espinoza, Eliana Marinari, Viviane Rochemont, Pierre-Yves Dietrich, Paul McSheehy, Felix Bachmann, Heidi A. Lane, Paul R. Walker

×

Figure 5

BAL101553-treated tumors are less infiltrated by BM-derived macrophages.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
BAL101553-treated tumors are less infiltrated by BM-derived macrophages....
(A and B) Proportion of brain-infiltrating myeloid cells, and their corresponding PD-L1 expression (C and D), from mice IC implanted with SB28 and treated with vehicle control (Ctrl), anti-CD40 (aCD40), BAL101553 (BAL), or a combination of BAL and aCD40 were collected at day 23 (A and C) or at time of terminal symptoms (B and D). Statistics: 2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. *: P < 0.05; ***: P < 0.001; ****: P < 0.0001. Error bars indicate SD. BMDM cells are defined as CD11b+CD49d+, microglia as CD11b+CD49d–. All cells are gated on CD45+ cells after exclusion of doublets and dead cells. Box-and-whisker plot with the bounds of the box representing lower and upper quartiles, the line within the box showing the median, and the whiskers showing minimum and maximum values. n = 3–4 mice per group.

Copyright © 2022 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts