Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Anti–PD-L1 and anti-CD73 combination therapy promotes T cell response to EGFR-mutated NSCLC
Eric Tu, … , Zachary A. Cooper, Katie Streicher
Eric Tu, … , Zachary A. Cooper, Katie Streicher
Published February 8, 2022
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2022;7(3):e142843. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.142843.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology Oncology

Anti–PD-L1 and anti-CD73 combination therapy promotes T cell response to EGFR-mutated NSCLC

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Treatment with anti–PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 therapies has shown durable clinical benefit in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, patients with NSCLC with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations do not respond as well to treatment as patients without an EGFR mutation. We show that EGFR-mutated NSCLC expressed higher levels of CD73 compared with EGFR WT tumors and that CD73 expression was regulated by EGFR signaling. EGFR-mutated cell lines were significantly more resistant to T cell killing compared with WT cell lines through suppression of T cell proliferation and function. In a xenograft mouse model of EGFR-mutated NSCLC, neither anti–PD-L1 nor anti-CD73 antibody alone inhibited tumor growth compared with the isotype control. In contrast, the combination of both antibodies significantly inhibited tumor growth, increased the number of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells, and enhanced IFN-γ and TNF-α production of these T cells. Consistently, there were increases in gene expression that corresponded to inflammation and T cell function in tumors treated with the combination of anti–PD-L1 and anti-CD73. Together, these results further support the combination of anti-CD73 and anti–PD-L1 therapies in treating EGFR-mutated NSCLC, while suggesting that increased T cell activity may play a role in response to therapy.

Authors

Eric Tu, Kelly McGlinchey, Jixin Wang, Philip Martin, Steven L.K. Ching, Nicolas Floc’h, James Kurasawa, Jacqueline H. Starrett, Yelena Lazdun, Leslie Wetzel, Barrett Nuttall, Felicia S.L. Ng, Karen T. Coffman, Paul D. Smith, Katerina Politi, Zachary A. Cooper, Katie Streicher

×

Figure 1

High CD73 expression in EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
High CD73 expression in EGFR-mutated NSCLC.
(A) Representative histology...
(A) Representative histology images of CD73 expression in EGFR WT and EGFR-mutated (MT) tumors. Scale bar: 50 μm. (B) Semiquantitative pathological assessment of CD73 expression in EGFR WT and MT tumor specimens. Each circle represents the data from 1 NSCLC surgical resection. (C) CD73 (also known as NT5E) mRNA and protein expression in EGFR WT and MT cell lines. (D) CD73 protein expression in EGFR WT and MT cell lines treated with EGF or osimertinib for 48 hours. (E) CD73 protein expression in EGFR WT and MT cell lines treated with ERK, PKC, or NF-κB inhibitor for 48 hours. (C–E) Data are representative of 2 independent experiments. EGFR WT cell lines were H1355, H157, and H322; EGFR MT cell lines were H1975, HCC2935, and PC9. Student’s t test (B and C) and ANOVA (D and E) were used. Bars indicate the median in B and the mean in C–E. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts