Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Tumor genotype, location, and malignant potential shape the immunogenicity of primary untreated gastrointestinal stromal tumors
Daniela Gasparotto, … , Dei Tos Angelo Paolo, Roberta Maestro
Daniela Gasparotto, … , Dei Tos Angelo Paolo, Roberta Maestro
Published October 13, 2020
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2020;5(22):e142560. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.142560.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology

Tumor genotype, location, and malignant potential shape the immunogenicity of primary untreated gastrointestinal stromal tumors

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Intratumoral immune infiltrate was recently reported in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, the tumor-intrinsic factors that dictate GIST immunogenicity are still largely undefined. To shed light on this issue, a large cohort (82 samples) of primary untreated GISTs, representative of major clinicopathological variables, was investigated by an integrated immunohistochemical, transcriptomic, and computational approach. Our results indicate that tumor genotype, location, and malignant potential concur to shape the immunogenicity of primary naive GISTs. Immune infiltration was greater in overt GISTs compared with that in lesions with limited malignant potential (miniGISTs), in KIT/PDGFRA-mutated tumors compared with that in KIT/PDGFRA WT tumors, and in PDGFRA-mutated compared with KIT-mutated GISTs. Within the KIT-mutated subset, a higher degree of immune colonization was detected in the intestine. Immune hot tumors showed expression patterns compatible with a potentially proficient but curbed antigen-specific immunity, hinting at sensitivity to immunomodulatory treatments. Poorly infiltrated GISTs, primarily KIT/PDGFRA WT intestinal tumors, showed activation of Hedgehog and WNT/β-catenin immune excluding pathways. This finding discloses a potential therapeutic vulnerability, as the targeting of these pathways might prove effective by both inhibiting pro-oncogenic signals and fostering antitumor immune responses. Finally, an intriguing anticorrelation between immune infiltration and ANO1/DOG1 expression was observed, suggesting an immunomodulatory activity for anoctamin-1.

Authors

Daniela Gasparotto, Marta Sbaraglia, Sabrina Rossi, Davide Baldazzi, Monica Brenca, Alessia Mondello, Federica Nardi, Dominga Racanelli, Matilde Cacciatore, Dei Tos Angelo Paolo, Roberta Maestro

×

Figure 5

Dissection of genotype, location, and malignant potential in GIST immunogenicity.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Dissection of genotype, location, and malignant potential in GIST immuno...
(A) Heatmap of the immune infiltration scores calculated with the indicated algorithms. Color-coded z scores for IIS, TIS (ssGSEA), CYT, CIBERSORT absolute (abs), and MCP-counter cumulative scores are shown. Samples are grouped according to tumor location, genotype, and malignant potential (miniGIST and overt GIST). (B) Relative proportion of the different immune cell types in intestinal (left) and gastric GIST (right) calculated by CIBERSORT. Mean proportion values (%) of the different cell types were calculated per each genotype (red line, KIT-mutated GIST; black line, PDGFRA-mutated GIST; blue line, K/P WT GIST) and reported in a radar plot. Dotted and dashed lines mark 1% and 10%, respectively. Macrophages M2 and T CD4 memory resting are the most represented immune cell types in both sites. (C) Violin plot showing the immunophenoscore of intestinal and gastric GISTs arranged according to genotype. The solid line indicates the median value; dashed lines indicate upper and lower quartiles. (D) Heatmap of APM genes and immune modulators in intestinal and gastric GIST. Data are presented as color-coded z scores calculated on log2TPM of the whole series (for color coding scale, see A). IIS, immune infiltration score; TIS, T cell infiltration score; ssGSEA, single-sample gene set enrichment analysis; CYT, cytolytic activity score; APM, antigen-presenting machinery.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts