Usage Information
Abstract
Alveolar macrophages (AMs) are differentially regulated by human surfactant protein-A1 (SP-A1) or SP-A2. However, AMs are very heterogeneous and differences are difficult to characterize in intact cells. Using the Toponome Imaging System (TIS), an imaging technique that uses sequential immunostaining to identify patterns of biomarker expression or combinatorial molecular phenotypes (CMPs), we studied individual single cells and identified subgroups of AMs (n = 168) from SP-A–KO mice and mice expressing either SP-A1 or SP-A2. The effects, as shown by CMPs, of SP-A1 and SP-A2 on AMs were significant and differed. SP-A1 AMs were the most diverse and shared the fewest CMPs with KO and SP-A2. Clustering analysis of each group showed 3 clusters where the CMP-based phenotype was distinct in each cluster. Moreover, a clustering analysis of all 168 AMs revealed 10 clusters, many dominated by 1 group. Some CMP overlap among groups was observed with SP-A2 AMs sharing the most CMPs and SP-A1 AMs the fewest. The CMP-based patterns identified here provide a basis for understanding not only AMs’ diversity, but also most importantly, the molecular basis for the diversity of functional differences in mouse models where the impact of genetics of innate immune molecules on AMs has been studied.
Authors
David S. Phelps, Vernon M. Chinchilli, Judith Weisz, Lili Yang, Debra Shearer, Xuesheng Zhang, Joanna Floros
Usage data is cumulative from January 2025 through January 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 356 | 26 |
| 119 | 3 | |
| Figure | 321 | 0 |
| Table | 305 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 46 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 85 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,232 | 29 |
| Total Views | 1,261 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
