Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Top read articles
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Concise Communication
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Monoallelic IRF5 deficiency in B cells prevents murine lupus
Alex Pellerin, … , Ramon G. Bonegio, Ian R. Rifkin
Alex Pellerin, … , Ramon G. Bonegio, Ian R. Rifkin
Published July 1, 2021
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2021;6(15):e141395. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.141395.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article

Monoallelic IRF5 deficiency in B cells prevents murine lupus

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Gain-of-function polymorphisms in the transcription factor IFN regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) are associated with an increased risk of developing systemic lupus erythematosus. However, the IRF5-expressing cell type(s) responsible for lupus pathogenesis in vivo is not known. We now show that monoallelic IRF5 deficiency in B cells markedly reduced disease in a murine lupus model. In contrast, similar reduction of IRF5 expression in macrophages, monocytes, and neutrophils did not reduce disease severity. B cell receptor and TLR7 signaling synergized to promote IRF5 phosphorylation and increase IRF5 protein expression, with these processes being independently regulated. This synergy increased B cell–intrinsic IL-6 and TNF-α production, both key requirements for germinal center (GC) responses, with IL-6 and TNF-α production in vitro and in vivo being substantially lower with loss of 1 allele of IRF5. Mechanistically, TLR7-dependent IRF5 nuclear translocation was reduced in B cells from IRF5-heterozygous mice. In addition, we show in multiple lupus models that IRF5 expression was dynamically regulated in vivo with increased expression in GC B cells compared with non-GC B cells and with further sequential increases during progression to plasmablasts and long-lived plasma cells. Overall, a critical threshold level of IRF5 in B cells was required to promote disease in murine lupus.

Authors

Alex Pellerin, Kei Yasuda, Abraham Cohen-Bucay, Vanessa Sandra, Prachi Shukla, Barry K. Horne Jr, Kerstin Nündel, Gregory A. Viglianti, Yao Xie, Ulf Klein, Ying Tan, Ramon G. Bonegio, Ian R. Rifkin

×

Figure 8

TLR7 signaling is required for IRF5 phosphorylation, and IRF5 nuclear translocation is reduced in B cells from FcγRIIB−/−Yaa IRF5+/– mice.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
TLR7 signaling is required for IRF5 phosphorylation, and IRF5 nuclear tr...
(A and B) B cells were isolated from the spleens of FcγRIIB−/−Yaa mice at 8–10 weeks of age. (A) B cells were stimulated with anti-IgM, anti-CD40, and R848 alone or in combination for 2 hours and the protein lysate analyzed using phospho-Tag gel (upper panel) or standard gel (lower panels). B cells isolated from an IRF5-deficient (IRF5–/–) mouse are shown in the first lane. p-IRF5 denotes phosphorylated IRF5. A representative example of 7 individual experiments is shown. (B) Ratio of p-IRF5 to unphosphorylated IRF5 (u-IRF5). Intensity of p-IRF5 was normalized to the intensity of unphosphorylated IRF5 (lowest band of IRF5 on p-Tag gel as shown in A) (n = 7). (C and D) B cells from FcγRIIB−/−Yaa (WT) and FcγRIIB−/−Yaa IRF5+/– mice were stimulated for 2 hours with R848, or not stimulated (untreated), and IRF5 was probed in the nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions. (C) A representative experiment of 4 individual experiments is shown. (D) Ratio of IRF5 expression in nucleus relative to the WT after R848 stimulation; nuclear IRF5 intensity in each sample was first normalized to its own loading control (histone; n = 5). Data are shown as mean ± SEM and were analyzed using 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. IRF5, IFN regulatory factor 5.

Copyright © 2022 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts