Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
IRF4 expression by lung dendritic cells drives acute but not Trm cell–dependent memory Th2 responses
Daniel F. Camacho, Tania E. Velez, Maile K. Hollinger, Esther Wang, Chanie L. Howard, Eli P. Darnell, Domenick E. Kennedy, Paulette A. Krishack, Cara L. Hrusch, Marcus R. Clark, James J. Moon, Anne I. Sperling
Daniel F. Camacho, Tania E. Velez, Maile K. Hollinger, Esther Wang, Chanie L. Howard, Eli P. Darnell, Domenick E. Kennedy, Paulette A. Krishack, Cara L. Hrusch, Marcus R. Clark, James J. Moon, Anne I. Sperling
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology

IRF4 expression by lung dendritic cells drives acute but not Trm cell–dependent memory Th2 responses

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Expression of the transcription factor interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4) is required for the development of lung conventional DCs type 2 (cDC2s) that elicit Th2 responses, yet how IRF4 functions in lung cDC2s throughout the acute and memory allergic response is not clear. Here, we used a mouse model that loses IRF4 expression after lung cDC2 development to demonstrate that mice with IRF4-deficient DCs display impaired memory responses to allergen. This defect in the memory response was a direct result of ineffective Th2 induction and impaired recruitment of activated effector T cells to the lung after sensitization. IRF4-deficient DCs demonstrated defects in their migration to the draining lymph node and in T cell priming. Finally, T cells primed by IRF4-competent DCs mediated potent memory responses independently of IRF4-expressing DCs, demonstrating that IRF4-expressing DCs are not necessary during the memory response. Thus, IRF4 controlled a program in mature DCs governing Th2 priming and effector responses, but IRF4-expressing DCs were dispensable during tissue-resident memory T cell–dependent memory responses.

Authors

Daniel F. Camacho, Tania E. Velez, Maile K. Hollinger, Esther Wang, Chanie L. Howard, Eli P. Darnell, Domenick E. Kennedy, Paulette A. Krishack, Cara L. Hrusch, Marcus R. Clark, James J. Moon, Anne I. Sperling

×

Figure 2

Lungs of mice with IRF4-deficient DCs contain fewer Der p 1–specific Th2rm cells during the memory phase.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Lungs of mice with IRF4-deficient DCs contain fewer Der p 1–specific Th2...
(A) Schematic of experimental protocol for resting memory lung analysis. (B) Number of lung Trm cells and the proportion expressing ST2; n = 20. Data are representative of 3 independent experiments with n ≥ 4 mice per group in each experiment. Analysis was performed by ordinary 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. (C) Gating of antigen-specific T cells and their expression of lineage-defining transcription factors. (D) Graphed flow plots show the number of tetramer+CD4+ Trm cells expressing GATA3 or Foxp3; n = 36. Three independent experiments (n ≥ 5 per group) were statistically significant. Two of these experiments combined are shown. Kruskal-Wallis test (with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test) was performed in GraphPad Prism. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01). Also see Supplemental Figures 3 and 4.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts