Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Top read articles
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
IL-32γ potentiates tumor immunity in melanoma
Thomas Gruber, … , Antoni Ribas, Mirjam Schenk
Thomas Gruber, … , Antoni Ribas, Mirjam Schenk
Published August 25, 2020
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2020;5(18):e138772. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.138772.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology Oncology

IL-32γ potentiates tumor immunity in melanoma

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Myeloid cells orchestrate the antitumor immune response and influence the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapies. We and others have previously shown that IL-32 mediates DC differentiation and macrophage activation. Here, we demonstrate that IL-32 expression in human melanoma positively correlates with overall survival, response to ICB, and an immune-inflamed tumor microenvironment (TME) enriched in mature DC, M1 macrophages, and CD8+ T cells. Treatment of B16F10 murine melanomas with IL-32 increased the frequencies of activated, tumor-specific CD8+ T cells, leading to the induction of systemic tumor immunity. Our mechanistic in vivo studies revealed a potentially novel role of IL-32 in activating intratumoral DC and macrophages to act in concert to prime CD8+ T cells and recruit them into the TME through CCL5. Thereby, IL-32 treatment reduced tumor growth and rendered ICB-resistant B16F10 tumors responsive to anti–PD-1 therapy without toxicity. Furthermore, increased baseline IL-32 gene expression was associated with response to nivolumab and pembrolizumab in 2 independent cohorts of patients with melanoma, implying that IL-32 is a predictive biomarker for anti–PD-1 therapy. Collectively, this study suggests IL-32 as a potent adjuvant in immunotherapy to enhance the efficacy of ICB in patients with non–T cell–inflamed TME.

Authors

Thomas Gruber, Mirela Kremenovic, Hassan Sadozai, Nives Rombini, Lukas Baeriswyl, Fabienne Maibach, Robert L. Modlin, Michel Gilliet, Diego von Werdt, Robert E. Hunger, S. Morteza Seyed Jafari, Giulia Parisi, Gabriel Abril-Rodriguez, Antoni Ribas, Mirjam Schenk

×

Figure 2

IL-32 expression correlates with a T cell–inflamed tumor microenvironment.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
IL-32 expression correlates with a T cell–inflamed tumor microenvironmen...
(A and B) Gene ontology term enrichment analysis of genes upregulated in IL-32hi melanomas; shown are the top 20 (A) “biological processes” and (B) “molecular functions.” Significantly upregulated genes were identified using FDR cutoff of Bonferroni-Hochberg–adjusted P = 0.01 and a log2 fold change = 1. (C) Gene expression of indicated markers for CD8+ effector T cells, CD8+ T cell–recruiting chemokines and Th1 cytokines in IL-32lo and IL-32hi melanoma samples. Gene expression is shown as normalized, log2-transformed counts. (D) Proportions of immune cells and nonimmune cells (other) in IL-32lo versus IL-32hi tumors, as estimated by quanTiSeq. (E) Relative proportions of indicated immune cell subsets in IL-32lo (n = 14) and IL-32hi (n = 101) groups, as estimated by CIBERSORT. (C–E) Data are shown as box-and-whisker plots. The box extends between 25% and 75%, and the whisker extends to the minimum and maximum values. Statistical significance was determined by 2-way ANOVA followed by Šidák’s multiple comparisons test. (A–D) n = 118; ****P < 0.0001.

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts