Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Histone deacetylases 1 and 2 restrain CD4+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte differentiation
Teresa Preglej, … , Nicole Boucheron, Wilfried Ellmeier
Teresa Preglej, … , Nicole Boucheron, Wilfried Ellmeier
Published February 27, 2020
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2020;5(4):e133393. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.133393.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology

Histone deacetylases 1 and 2 restrain CD4+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte differentiation

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Some effector CD4+ T cell subsets display cytotoxic activity, thus breaking the functional dichotomy of CD4+ helper and CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes. However, molecular mechanisms regulating CD4+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CD4+ CTL) differentiation are poorly understood. Here we show that levels of histone deacetylases 1 and 2 (HDAC1-HDAC2) are key determinants of CD4+ CTL differentiation. Deletions of both Hdac1 and 1 Hdac2 alleles (HDAC1cKO-HDAC2HET) in CD4+ T cells induced a T helper cytotoxic program that was controlled by IFN-γ–JAK1/2–STAT1 signaling. In vitro, activated HDAC1cKO-HDAC2HET CD4+ T cells acquired cytolytic activity and displayed enrichment of gene signatures characteristic of effector CD8+ T cells and human CD4+ CTLs. In vivo, murine cytomegalovirus–infected HDAC1cKO-HDAC2HET mice displayed a stronger induction of CD4+ CTL features compared with infected WT mice. Finally, murine and human CD4+ T cells treated with short-chain fatty acids, which are commensal-produced metabolites acting as HDAC inhibitors, upregulated CTL genes. Our data demonstrate that HDAC1-HDAC2 restrain CD4+ CTL differentiation. Thus, HDAC1-HDAC2 might be targets for the therapeutic induction of CD4+ CTLs.

Authors

Teresa Preglej, Patricia Hamminger, Maik Luu, Tanja Bulat, Liisa Andersen, Lisa Göschl, Valentina Stolz, Ramona Rica, Lisa Sandner, Darina Waltenberger, Roland Tschismarov, Thomas Faux, Thorina Boenke, Asta Laiho, Laura L. Elo, Shinya Sakaguchi, Günter Steiner, Thomas Decker, Barbara Bohle, Alexander Visekruna, Christoph Bock, Birgit Strobl, Christian Seiser, Nicole Boucheron, Wilfried Ellmeier

×

Figure 7

Human CD4+ T cells upregulate Th cytotoxic genes upon HDACi treatment.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Human CD4+ T cells upregulate Th cytotoxic genes upon HDACi treatment.
(...
(A) GSEA plots of human CD4+ CTL-specific gene sets (containing 517 genes) in activated HDAC1cKO-HDAC2HET CD4+ T cells relative to activated WT CD4+ T cells. The barcode indicates the location of the members of the gene set in the ranked list of all genes. (B) Flow cytometry analysis showing CD4, CD8α, IFN-γ, and granzyme B expression in naive human CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (right panel) activated with CD3/CD28 Dynabeads for 5 days, for the last 24 hours in the presence of DMSO (left panel) and MS-275 (middle panel), respectively. (C) Summary of experiments described in A. Diagrams depict the percentages of activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, respectively, expressing CD8α, IFN-γ, and granzyme B. (D) Histogram panel depicts RUNX3 expression in activated CD4+ T cells (as described in A) treated with DMSO (upper panel) or MS-275 (middle panel) for 24 hours and untreated CD8+ T cells as staining control (lower panel). (E) Summary of the experiment described in C. Diagram depicts the FC of MFI of RUNX3 expression in activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, respectively. (F and H) Flow cytometry analysis showing IFN-γ, granzyme B, and EOMES expression on human Th1 cells cultured in the absence (control) or presence of pentanoate. Diagrams depict the summary of (G) the percentages of IFN-γ+ and IFN-γ+GZMB+ human Th1 cells, respectively, as well as (H) MFI of EOMES expression in human Th1 cells. Data are representative (B, D, F, and H) or show a summary (C, E, F, G) of 5 (B and C for CD8α), 4 (B–D for IFN-γ, GZMB, RUNX3), or 3 (H) human donors who were analyzed in 2 (F–H), 5 (B and C for CD8α), or 4 (B–E for IFN-γ, GZMB, RUNX3) independent experiments. Numbers indicate the percentages of cells in the respective quadrants or gates (B and F) or MFI (D). (D) The dotted vertical lines indicate the peak of the WT histogram (for MFI). (C, E, G, and H) Each symbol indicates 1 human donor. Horizontal bars indicate the mean. *P < 0.05 (paired 2-tailed Student’s t test).

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts