Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Pharmacological chaperone action in humanized mouse models of MC4R-linked obesity
Patricia René, Damien Lanfray, Denis Richard, Michel Bouvier
Patricia René, Damien Lanfray, Denis Richard, Michel Bouvier
View: Text | PDF
Resource and Technical Advance Metabolism Therapeutics

Pharmacological chaperone action in humanized mouse models of MC4R-linked obesity

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

MC4R mutations represent the largest monogenic cause of obesity, resulting mainly from receptor misfolding and intracellular retention by the cellular quality control system. The present study aimed at determining whether pharmacological chaperones (PCs) that restore folding and plasma membrane trafficking by stabilizing near native protein conformation may represent valid therapeutic avenues for the treatment of melanocortin type 4 receptor–linked (MC4R-linked) obesity. To test the therapeutic PC potential, we engineered humanized MC4R (hMC4R) mouse models expressing either the WT human MC4R or a prevalent obesity-causing mutant (R165W). Administration of a PC able to rescue cell surface expression and functional activity of R165W-hMC4R in cells restored the anorexigenic response of the R165W-hMC4R obese mice to melanocortin agonist, providing a proof of principle for the therapeutic potential of MC4R-targeting PCs in vivo. Interestingly, the expression of the WT-hMC4R in mice revealed lower sensitivity of the human receptor to α–melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH) but not β-MSH or melanotan II, resulting in a lower penetrance obese phenotype in the WT-hMC4R versus R165W-hMC4R mice. In conclusion, we created 2 new obesity models, a hypomorphic highlighting species differences and an amorphic providing a preclinical model to test the therapeutic potential of PCs to treat MC4R-linked obesity.

Authors

Patricia René, Damien Lanfray, Denis Richard, Michel Bouvier

×

Figure 8

Effect of UM0130866 on MTII agonist response on food intake in hMC4R-KI mice and in loxTB MC4R-null mice.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Effect of UM0130866 on MTII agonist response on food intake in hMC4R-KI ...
(A) Schematic representation of the paradigm. (B–D) HOMO male mice from each transgenic line at 13 to 18 weeks old and their NTG littermates, respectively, received per os (gavage) 100 mpk UM0130866: SDD formulated in 0.5% methyl cellulose (metcell) in water, at ZT11 (1 hour before lights off) followed by an i.p. injection of 10 mpk (NTG) or 20 mpk (Homo) of MTII at ZT15 (3 hours after lights off) using a randomized crossover experimental design. Food intake was measured for 2 hours between ZT17 (5 hours after lights off) and ZT19 (7 hours after lights off) in individualized mice. Data are the mean ± SEM of WT-hMC4R-KI mice (B) (NTG = 23 and HOMO = 22), R165W-hMC4R (C) (NTG = 17; HOMO = 45) and loxTB MC4R-null mice (D) (NTG = 19; HOMO = 18). The asterisks denote significant difference of treated group compared with control group using 1-way Kruskal-Wallis test of variance followed by pairwise comparisons using post hoc Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. **P < 0.001.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts