Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Pharmacological chaperone action in humanized mouse models of MC4R-linked obesity
Patricia René, Damien Lanfray, Denis Richard, Michel Bouvier
Patricia René, Damien Lanfray, Denis Richard, Michel Bouvier
View: Text | PDF
Resource and Technical Advance Metabolism Therapeutics

Pharmacological chaperone action in humanized mouse models of MC4R-linked obesity

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

MC4R mutations represent the largest monogenic cause of obesity, resulting mainly from receptor misfolding and intracellular retention by the cellular quality control system. The present study aimed at determining whether pharmacological chaperones (PCs) that restore folding and plasma membrane trafficking by stabilizing near native protein conformation may represent valid therapeutic avenues for the treatment of melanocortin type 4 receptor–linked (MC4R-linked) obesity. To test the therapeutic PC potential, we engineered humanized MC4R (hMC4R) mouse models expressing either the WT human MC4R or a prevalent obesity-causing mutant (R165W). Administration of a PC able to rescue cell surface expression and functional activity of R165W-hMC4R in cells restored the anorexigenic response of the R165W-hMC4R obese mice to melanocortin agonist, providing a proof of principle for the therapeutic potential of MC4R-targeting PCs in vivo. Interestingly, the expression of the WT-hMC4R in mice revealed lower sensitivity of the human receptor to α–melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH) but not β-MSH or melanotan II, resulting in a lower penetrance obese phenotype in the WT-hMC4R versus R165W-hMC4R mice. In conclusion, we created 2 new obesity models, a hypomorphic highlighting species differences and an amorphic providing a preclinical model to test the therapeutic potential of PCs to treat MC4R-linked obesity.

Authors

Patricia René, Damien Lanfray, Denis Richard, Michel Bouvier

×

Figure 3

Central effect of natural melanocortin agonists on nocturnal food intake in WT-hMC4R-KI and loxTB MC4R-null mice.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Central effect of natural melanocortin agonists on nocturnal food intake...
Icv injections in 16- to 22-week-old WT-hMC4R-KI (A) (NTG = 9; Homo = 10) or loxTB MC4R-null (B) (NTG = 9; Homo = 8) male mice. Icv injection of doses of α-MSH (left panel) or β-MSH (right panel) (20 pmol/μL and 100 pmol/μL, from upper to lower panels) were done at Zeitgeber time 10 (ZT10) (10 hours after lights on). Food consumption was then assessed between ZT10 and ZT15 (3 hours after lights off). Food consumption was then normalized relative to the basal food consumption measured the day before for each mouse (% food intake vs. basal) and is expressed as means ± SEM. The sequence of the α-MSH peptide used is shared between mouse and human whereas the human sequence was used for β-MSH since it is not produced in the mouse. The asterisks denote significant difference of α-MSH or β-MSH group compared with the group receiving artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) only, using Wilcoxon’s matched pairs signed-rank test. **P < 0.001.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts