Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
VEGF188 promotes corneal reinnervation after injury
James T. Brash, Laura Denti, Christiana Ruhrberg, Franziska Bucher
James T. Brash, Laura Denti, Christiana Ruhrberg, Franziska Bucher
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Ophthalmology

VEGF188 promotes corneal reinnervation after injury

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF) induces angiogenesis and vascular hyperpermeability in ocular tissues and is therefore a key therapeutic target for eye conditions in which these processes are dysregulated. In contrast, the therapeutic potential of VEGF’s neurotrophic roles in the eye has remained unexploited. In particular, it is not known whether modulating levels of any of the 3 major alternatively spliced VEGF isoforms might provide a therapeutic approach to promote neural health in the eye without inducing vascular pathology. Here, we have used a variety of mouse models to demonstrate differences in overall VEGF levels and VEGF isoform ratios across tissues in the healthy eye. We further show that VEGF isoform expression was differentially regulated in retinal versus corneal disease models. Among the 3 major isoforms — termed VEGF120, VEGF164, and VEGF188 — VEGF188 was upregulated to the greatest extent in injured cornea, where it was both necessary and sufficient for corneal nerve regeneration. Moreover, topical VEGF188 application further promoted corneal nerve regeneration without inducing pathological neovascularization. VEGF isoform modulation should therefore be explored further for its potential in promoting neural health in the eye.

Authors

James T. Brash, Laura Denti, Christiana Ruhrberg, Franziska Bucher

×

Figure 3

Vegfa isoform expression in models of corneal injury.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint

Vegfa isoform expression in models of corneal injury.
(A–C) Corneal neo...
(A–C) Corneal neovascularization. (A) Schematic representation of the corneal neovascularization assay in wild-type CD1 mice. Three sutures are placed into the corneal stroma (en face view; D0). Neovessels sprout from the limbus toward the sutures from D1 after surgery and reach the central cornea by D7 (lateral views). (B and C) Total Vegfa and Vegfa isoform expression, shown as (B) fold change in sutured versus naive corneas (mean ± SD) and (C) as proportions of isoforms (mean; only the negative arm of the SD is shown); n = 5 mice per condition; each data point represents the value for 1 cornea from 1 mouse. (D–F) Corneal abrasion. (D) Schematic representation of the corneal abrasion assay in wild-type CD1 mice (en face views). Central epithelium and subepithelial nerves are removed (D0). The epithelial wound is nearly closed on D1, but nerves have not yet regenerated. Reinnervation of the injured cornea is visible on D7. (E and F) Total Vegfa and Vegfa isoform expression, shown as (E) fold change in sutured versus naive corneas (mean ± SD) and (F) as proportions of isoforms (mean; only the negative arm of the SD is shown); n = 7 mice per condition; each data point represents the value for 1 cornea from 1 mouse. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001; 1-way ANOVA with Šidák’s multiple-comparisons test.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts