Tumor-infiltrating B cells (TIL-B) in breast cancer (BC) have previously been associated with improved clinical outcomes; however, their roles in tumor immunity are not currently well known. This study confirms and extends the correlation between higher TIL-B densities and positive outcomes through an analysis of HER2+ and triple-negative BC patients from the BIG 02-98 clinical trial (10-year median follow-up). Fresh tissue analyses identify an increase in TIL-B density in untreated primary BC compared with normal breast tissues, which is associated with global, CD4+, and CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL); higher tumor grades; higher proliferation; and hormone receptor negativity. All B cell differentiation stages are detectable, but significant increases in memory TIL-B are consistently present. BC with higher infiltrates are specifically characterized by germinal center TIL-B, which in turn are correlated with T follicular helper (TFH) TIL and antibody-secreting TIL-B principally located in tertiary lymphoid structures. Some TIL-B also interact directly with tumor cells. Functional analyses reveal that TIL-B are responsive to B cell receptor (BCR) stimulation ex vivo, express activation markers, and produce cytokines and Igs despite reduced expression of the antigen-presenting molecules HLA-DR and CD40. Overall, these data support the concept that ongoing humoral immune responses are generated by TIL-B and help to promote effective antitumor immunity at the tumor site.
Soizic Garaud, Laurence Buisseret, Cinzia Solinas, Chunyan Gu-Trantien, Alexandre de Wind, Gert Van den Eynden, Celine Naveaux, Jean-Nicolas Lodewyckx, Anaïs Boisson, Hughes Duvillier, Ligia Craciun, Lieveke Ameye, Isabelle Veys, Marianne Paesmans, Denis Larsimont, Martine Piccart-Gebhart, Karen Willard-Gallo
Usage data is cumulative from August 2019 through July 2020.
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.