Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Dual PPARα/γ activation inhibits SIRT1-PGC1α axis and causes cardiac dysfunction
Charikleia Kalliora, Ioannis D. Kyriazis, Shin-ichi Oka, Melissa J. Lieu, Yujia Yue, Estela Area-Gomez, Christine J. Pol, Ying Tian, Wataru Mizushima, Adave Chin, Diego Scerbo, P. Christian Schulze, Mete Civelek, Junichi Sadoshima, Muniswamy Madesh, Ira J. Goldberg, Konstantinos Drosatos
Charikleia Kalliora, Ioannis D. Kyriazis, Shin-ichi Oka, Melissa J. Lieu, Yujia Yue, Estela Area-Gomez, Christine J. Pol, Ying Tian, Wataru Mizushima, Adave Chin, Diego Scerbo, P. Christian Schulze, Mete Civelek, Junichi Sadoshima, Muniswamy Madesh, Ira J. Goldberg, Konstantinos Drosatos
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Metabolism

Dual PPARα/γ activation inhibits SIRT1-PGC1α axis and causes cardiac dysfunction

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Dual PPARα/γ agonists that were developed to target hyperlipidemia and hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes caused cardiac dysfunction or other adverse effects. We studied the mechanisms that underlie the cardiotoxic effects of a dual PPARα/γ agonist, tesaglitazar, in wild-type and diabetic (leptin receptor–deficient, db/db) mice. Mice treated with tesaglitazar-containing chow or high-fat diet developed cardiac dysfunction despite lower plasma triglycerides and glucose levels. Expression of cardiac PPARγ coactivator 1-α (PGC1α), which promotes mitochondrial biogenesis, had the most profound reduction among various fatty acid metabolism genes. Furthermore, we observed increased acetylation of PGC1α, which suggests PGC1α inhibition and lowered sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) expression. This change was associated with lower mitochondrial abundance. Combined pharmacological activation of PPARα and PPARγ in C57BL/6 mice reproduced the reduction of PGC1α expression and mitochondrial abundance. Resveratrol-mediated SIRT1 activation attenuated tesaglitazar-induced cardiac dysfunction and corrected myocardial mitochondrial respiration in C57BL/6 and diabetic mice but not in cardiomyocyte-specific Sirt1–/– mice. Our data show that drugs that activate both PPARα and PPARγ lead to cardiac dysfunction associated with PGC1α suppression and lower mitochondrial abundance, likely due to competition between these 2 transcription factors.

Authors

Charikleia Kalliora, Ioannis D. Kyriazis, Shin-ichi Oka, Melissa J. Lieu, Yujia Yue, Estela Area-Gomez, Christine J. Pol, Ying Tian, Wataru Mizushima, Adave Chin, Diego Scerbo, P. Christian Schulze, Mete Civelek, Junichi Sadoshima, Muniswamy Madesh, Ira J. Goldberg, Konstantinos Drosatos

×

Figure 4

PPARα impairs PPARγ-mediated activation of PPARGC1A promoter activity.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
PPARα impairs PPARγ-mediated activation of PPARGC1A promoter activity.
(...
(A) PPARA, PPARG, and PPARGC1A mRNA levels were assessed in AC16 cells infected with recombinant adenoviruses (Ad) expressing PPARα or PPARγ (n = 6–12; data were collected from 2 independent experiments). *P < 0.05; ****P < 0.0001 vs. Ad-GFP; #P < 0.05; ####P < 0.0001 vs. Ad-PPARα; $$$$P < 0.0001 vs. Ad-PPARγ. (B) Ppargc1a mRNA levels in AC16 cells treated with 50 μM rosiglitazone (PPARγ agonist), 50 μM WY-14643 (PPARα agonist), a combination of rosiglitazone and WY-14643, or a combination of rosiglitazone, WY-14643, and 10 μM MK886 (PPARα antagonist) (B; n = 10–22; data were collected from 2 independent experiments). (C–F) Luciferase activity (fold change) in AC16 cells transfected with reporter plasmids containing the following human PPARγ coactivator 1-α (PPARGC1A) promoter fragments: pGL3-basic vector(BV)-PPARGC1A-1631 (C), pGL3BV-a-PPARGC1A-1386 (D), pGL3BV-a-PPARGC1A-1012 (E), pGL3BV-a-PPARGC1A-210 (F), followed by treatment with 50 μM rosiglitazone, 50 μM WY-14643, or a combination of both (n = 4–12). (B–F) Data were collected from 1 experiment. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 vs. ctrl; #P < 0.05; ##P < 0.01 vs. rosiglitazone; $$P < 0.01 vs. WY-14642. (G) PPARα and PPARγ enrichment of the Ppargc1a gene promoter following chromatin immunoprecipitation from cardiac tissue obtained from C57BL/6 mice (n = 4). **P < 0.01. Statistical analyses were performed with 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc correction. Error bars represent SEM.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts