Adoptive T cell therapy (ACT) has been established as an efficacious methodology for the treatment of cancer. Identifying targets to enhance the antigen recognition, functional capacity, and longevity of T cells has the potential to broaden the applicability of these approaches in the clinic. We previously reported that targeting expression of phosphotyrosine phosphatase, nonreceptor type 22 (PTPN22) in effector CD8+ T cells enhances the efficacy of ACT for tumor clearance in mice. In the current work, we demonstrate that, upon ACT, PTPN22-deficient effector CD8+ T cells afforded greater protection against tumors expressing very low-affinity antigen but did not survive long term in vivo. Persistence of CD8+ T cells following tumor clearance was improved by ACT of memory phenotype cells that have a distinct metabolic phenotype, as compared with effector T cells. Importantly, PTPN22-deficient T cells have comparable capacity to form long-lived memory cells in vivo but enhanced antitumor activity in vivo and effector responses ex vivo. These findings provide key insights into the regulation of effector and memory T cell responses in vivo and indicate that PTPN22 is a rational target to improve ACT for cancer.
Rebecca J. Brownlie, David Wright, Rose Zamoyska, Robert J. Salmond
Usage data is cumulative from April 2023 through April 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 359 | 164 |
64 | 36 | |
Figure | 177 | 2 |
Supplemental data | 22 | 3 |
Citation downloads | 15 | 0 |
Totals | 637 | 205 |
Total Views | 842 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.