Extracellular mRNAs (ex-mRNAs) potentially supersede extracellular miRNAs (ex-miRNAs) and other RNA classes as biomarkers. We performed conventional small-RNA-sequencing (sRNA-seq) and sRNA-seq with T4 polynucleotide kinase (PNK) end treatment of total extracellular RNAs (exRNAs) isolated from serum and platelet-poor EDTA, acid citrate dextrose (ACD), and heparin plasma to study the effect on ex-mRNA capture. Compared with conventional sRNA-seq, PNK treatment increased the detection of informative ex-mRNAs reads up to 50-fold. The exRNA pool was dominated by RNA originating from hematopoietic cells and platelets, with additional contribution from the liver. About 60% of the 15- to 42-nt reads originated from the coding sequences, in a pattern reminiscent of ribosome profiling. Blood sample type had a considerable influence on the exRNA profile. On average approximately 350–1100 distinct ex-mRNA transcripts were detected depending on plasma type. In serum, additional transcripts from neutrophils and hematopoietic cells increased this number to near 2300. EDTA and ACD plasma showed a destabilizing effect on ex‑mRNA and noncoding RNA ribonucleoprotein complexes compared with other plasma types. In a proof-of-concept study, we investigated differences between the exRNA profiles of patients with acute coronary syndrome and healthy controls. The improved tissue resolution of ex‑mRNAs after PNK treatment enabled us to detect a neutrophil signature in ACS that escaped detection by ex‑miRNA analysis.
Kemal M. Akat, Youngmin A. Lee, Arlene Hurley, Pavel Morozov, Klaas E.A. Max, Miguel Brown, Kimberly Bogardus, Anuoluwapo Sopeyin, Kai Hildner, Thomas G. Diacovo, Markus F. Neurath, Martin Borggrefe, Thomas Tuschl
Usage data is cumulative from April 2019 through May 2019.
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.