Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Targeting tumor-resident mast cells for effective anti-melanoma immune responses
Susanne Kaesler, Florian Wölbing, Wolfgang Eberhard Kempf, Yuliya Skabytska, Martin Köberle, Thomas Volz, Tobias Sinnberg, Teresa Amaral, Sigrid Möckel, Amir Yazdi, Gisela Metzler, Martin Schaller, Karin Hartmann, Benjamin Weide, Claus Garbe, Hans-Georg Rammensee, Martin Röcken, Tilo Biedermann
Susanne Kaesler, Florian Wölbing, Wolfgang Eberhard Kempf, Yuliya Skabytska, Martin Köberle, Thomas Volz, Tobias Sinnberg, Teresa Amaral, Sigrid Möckel, Amir Yazdi, Gisela Metzler, Martin Schaller, Karin Hartmann, Benjamin Weide, Claus Garbe, Hans-Georg Rammensee, Martin Röcken, Tilo Biedermann
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology Oncology

Targeting tumor-resident mast cells for effective anti-melanoma immune responses

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Immune checkpoint blockade has revolutionized cancer treatment. Patients developing immune mediated adverse events, such as colitis, appear to particularly benefit from immune checkpoint inhibition. Yet, the contributing mechanisms are largely unknown. We identified a systemic LPS signature in melanoma patients with colitis following anti–cytotoxic T lymphocyte–associated antigen 4 (anti–CTLA-4) checkpoint inhibitor treatment and hypothesized that intestinal microbiota–derived LPS contributes to therapeutic efficacy. Because activation of immune cells within the tumor microenvironment is considered most promising to effectively control cancer, we analyzed human and murine melanoma for known sentinels of LPS. We identified mast cells (MCs) accumulating in and around melanomas and showed that effective melanoma immune control was dependent on LPS-activated MCs recruiting tumor-infiltrating effector T cells by secretion of CXCL10. Importantly, CXCL10 was also upregulated in human melanomas with immune regression and in patients with colitis induced by anti–CTLA-4 antibody. Furthermore, we demonstrate that CXCL10 upregulation and an MC signature at the site of melanomas are biomarkers for better patient survival. These findings provide conclusive evidence for a “Trojan horse treatment strategy” in which the plasticity of cancer-resident immune cells, such as MCs, is used as a target to boost tumor immune defense.

Authors

Susanne Kaesler, Florian Wölbing, Wolfgang Eberhard Kempf, Yuliya Skabytska, Martin Köberle, Thomas Volz, Tobias Sinnberg, Teresa Amaral, Sigrid Möckel, Amir Yazdi, Gisela Metzler, Martin Schaller, Karin Hartmann, Benjamin Weide, Claus Garbe, Hans-Georg Rammensee, Martin Röcken, Tilo Biedermann

×

Figure 1

LPS signature in melanoma patients treated with α–CTLA-4.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
LPS signature in melanoma patients treated with α–CTLA-4.
(A) Best overa...
(A) Best overall response to immunotherapy with α–CTLA-4 and α–PD-1 in patients with stage IV melanoma as assessed by staging and the immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and (B) Kaplan-Meier analyses comparing patients with checkpoint treatment–related colitis (n = 16) and patients with other irAEs (n = 22). (C–F) Serum samples before and after α–CTLA-4 treatment of patients with stage IV melanoma were divided into the following 2 groups: patients without (“w/o colitis”) or with (“colitis”) therapy-provoked enterocolitis (n = 6 per group). (C) Heatmap of different protein levels as determined by multiplex immunoassays of the sera. (D) Pie charts of protein serum levels of 3 LPS-induced key cytokines shown in C, where the size of the pie pieces correlates with the expression level of the cytokines. The schematic on the top shows the arrangement of the different conditions; the colors in the pie charts are the same as in the heatmap. (E) Serum LPS-BP levels of the “colitis” group measured by quantitative ELISA. (F) Changes in LPS-BP serum concentration with α–CTLA-4 treatment. P values were calculated with log-rank test (B), Wilcoxon’s test (E), or Mann-Whitney U test (F) using GraphPad Prism software. CR, complete response; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.005.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts