Macrophage activation, i.e., classical M1 and the alternative M2, plays a critical role in many pathophysiological processes, such as inflammation and tissue injury and repair. Although the regulation of macrophage activation has been under extensive investigation, there is little knowledge about the role of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) in this event. In this study, we found that lncRNA Malat1 expression is distinctly regulated in differentially activated macrophages in that it is upregulated in LPS-treated and downregulated in IL-4–treated cells. Malat1 knockdown attenuates LPS-induced M1 macrophage activation. In contrast, Malat1 knockdown enhanced IL-4–activated M2 differentiation as well as a macrophage profibrotic phenotype. Mechanistically, Malat1 knockdown led to decreased expression of Clec16a, silencing of which phenocopied the regulatory effect of Malat1 on M1 activation. Interestingly, Malat1 knockdown promoted IL-4 induction of mitochondrial pyruvate carriers (MPCs) and their mediation of glucose-derived oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos), which was crucial to the Malat1 regulation of M2 differentiation and profibrotic phenotype. Furthermore, mice with either global or conditional myeloid knockout of Malat1 demonstrated diminished LPS-induced systemic and pulmonary inflammation and injury. In contrast, these mice developed more severe bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis, accompanied by alveolar macrophages displaying augmented M2 and profibrotic phenotypes. In summary, we have identified what we believe is a previously unrecognized role of Malat1 in the regulation of macrophage polarization. Our data demonstrate that Malat1 is involved in pulmonary pathogeneses in association with aberrant macrophage activation.
Huachun Cui, Sami Banerjee, Sijia Guo, Na Xie, Jing Ge, Dingyuan Jiang, Martin Zörnig, Victor J. Thannickal, Gang Liu
Usage data is cumulative from April 2023 through April 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 595 | 530 |
66 | 86 | |
Figure | 110 | 25 |
Supplemental data | 19 | 13 |
Citation downloads | 13 | 0 |
Totals | 803 | 654 |
Total Views | 1,457 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.