Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
An effective mouse model for adoptive cancer immunotherapy targeting neoantigens
Ken-ichi Hanada, Zhiya Yu, Gabrielle R. Chappell, Adam S. Park, Nicholas P. Restifo
Ken-ichi Hanada, Zhiya Yu, Gabrielle R. Chappell, Adam S. Park, Nicholas P. Restifo
View: Text | PDF
Resource and Technical Advance Immunology Vaccines

An effective mouse model for adoptive cancer immunotherapy targeting neoantigens

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The adoptive cell transfer (ACT) of T cells targeting mutated neoantigens can cause objective responses in varieties of metastatic cancers, but the development of new T cell–based treatments relies on accurate animal models. To investigate the therapeutic effect of targeting a neoantigen with ACT, we used T cells from pmel-1 T cell receptor–transgenic mice, known to recognize a WT peptide, gp100, and a mutated version of the peptide that has higher avidity. We gene-engineered B16 cells to express the WT or mutated gp100 epitopes and found that pmel-1–specific T cells targeting a neoantigen tumor target augmented recognition as measured by IFN-γ production. Neoantigen expression by B16 also enhanced the capacity of pmel-1 T cells to trigger the complete and durable regression of large, established, vascularized tumor and required less lymphodepleting conditioning. Targeting neoantigen uncovered the possibility of using enforced expression of the IL-2Rα chain (CD25) in mutation-reactive CD8+ T cells to improve their antitumor functionality. These data reveal that targeting of “mutated-self” neoantigens may lead to improved efficacy and reduced toxicities of T cell–based cellular immunotherapies for patients with cancer.

Authors

Ken-ichi Hanada, Zhiya Yu, Gabrielle R. Chappell, Adam S. Park, Nicholas P. Restifo

×

Figure 3

Effects of pmel-1 T cell numbers in neoantigen-targeting ACT model.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Effects of pmel-1 T cell numbers in neoantigen-targeting ACT model.
(A) ...
(A) C57BL/6 mice were inoculated with 5 × 105 B16KVP/Db tumor cells 11 days before treatment. One day before ACT, mice were irradiated with 0 [IR(–)] or 5 Gy [IR(+)]. On the day of ACT, mice were injected i.v. with PBS (control, open circles), pmel-1 T cells [VAC (–), gray circles] at indicated doses, or pmel-1 T cells mixed with 2 × 107 PFU of rVVhgp100 [VAC (+), black circles]. A daily dose of 180,000 IU of rhIL-2 was administrated i.p. into all mice for 3 days after ACT. There were 5 mice in each group. Error bars indicate the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 and NS indicates no significant differences by Wilcoxon rank-sum test in comparison of tumor growth curve slopes between correspondent groups. Results represent 1 of 2 independent experiments. (B) Tumor-free mice in combined 2 experiments. Open squares represent without irradiation or vaccination group; red squares represent without irradiation with vaccination group; open circles represent with irradiation without vaccination group; red circles represent with irradiation and vaccination group. Ten mice were included in each group.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts