To what extent does the subarachnoid cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) compartment communicate directly with the extravascular compartment of human brain tissue? Interconnection between the subarachnoid CSF compartment and brain perivascular spaces is reported in some animal studies, but with controversy, and in vivo CSF tracer studies in humans are lacking. In the present work, we examined the distribution of a CSF tracer in the human brain by MRI over a prolonged time span. For this, we included a reference cohort, representing close to healthy individuals, and a cohort of patients with dementia and anticipated compromise of CSF circulation (idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus). The MRI contrast agent gadobutrol, which is confined to the extravascular brain compartment by the intact blood-brain barrier, was used as a CSF tracer. Standardized T1-weighted MRI scans were performed before and after intrathecal gadobutrol at defined time points, including at 24 hours, 48 hours, and 4 weeks. All MRI scans were aligned and brain regions were segmented using FreeSurfer, and changes in normalized T1 signals over time were quantified as percentage change from baseline. The study provides in vivo evidence of access to all human brain subregions of a substance administered intrathecally. Clearance of the tracer substance was delayed in the dementia cohort. These observations translate previous findings in animal studies into humans and open new prospects concerning intrathecal treatment regimens, extravascular contrast-enhanced MRI, and assessment of brain clearance function.
Geir Ringstad, Lars M. Valnes, Anders M. Dale, Are H. Pripp, Svein-Are S. Vatnehol, Kyrre E. Emblem, Kent-Andre Mardal, Per K. Eide
Usage data is cumulative from March 2022 through March 2023.
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.