Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Top read articles
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
CD226 opposes TIGIT to disrupt Tregs in melanoma
Julien Fourcade, … , Alan J. Korman, Hassane M. Zarour
Julien Fourcade, … , Alan J. Korman, Hassane M. Zarour
Published July 25, 2018
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2018;3(14):e121157. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.121157.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology Oncology

CD226 opposes TIGIT to disrupt Tregs in melanoma

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

CD4+ Tregs impede T cell responses to tumors. They express multiple inhibitory receptors that support their suppressive functions, including T cell Ig and ITIM domain (TIGIT). In melanoma patients, we show that Tregs exhibit increased TIGIT expression and decreased expression of its competing costimulatory receptor CD226 as compared with CD4+ effector T cells, resulting in an increased TIGIT/CD226 ratio. Tregs failed to upregulate CD226 upon T cell activation. TIGIT+ Tregs are highly suppressive, stable, and enriched in tumors. TIGIT and CD226 oppose each other to augment or disrupt, respectively, Treg suppression and stability. A high TIGIT/CD226 ratio in Tregs correlates with increased Treg frequencies in tumors and poor clinical outcome upon immune checkpoint blockade. Altogether, our findings show that a high TIGIT/CD226 ratio in Tregs regulates their suppressive function and stability in melanoma. They provide the rationale for novel immunotherapies to activate CD226 in Tregs together with TIGIT blockade to counteract Treg suppression in cancer patients.

Authors

Julien Fourcade, Zhaojun Sun, Joe-Marc Chauvin, Mignane Ka, Diwakar Davar, Ornella Pagliano, Hong Wang, Sofiane Saada, Carmine Menna, Rada Amin, Cindy Sander, John M. Kirkwood, Alan J. Korman, Hassane M. Zarour

×

Figure 6

High TIGIT/CD226 imbalance in Tregs in metastatic melanoma correlates with high Treg frequencies and poor clinical outcome upon immune checkpoint blockade.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
High TIGIT/CD226 imbalance in Tregs in metastatic melanoma correlates wi...
(A) Correlations between the ratio of TIGIT to CD226 expression (percentage and mean fluorescence intensity [MFI]) by CD25hiFoxp3+ Tregs and the frequencies of CD25hiFoxp3+ Tregs within total CD4+ T cells in PBMCs of melanoma patients (MPs) or metastatic melanoma (MM) tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs)s. n = 50. (B) Responses to ICB plotted versus the ratio of TIGIT to CD226 expression (MFI) in CD25hiFoxp3+ Tregs from PBMCs of MPs treated with aPD-1 mAbs (n = 25; left) or MM TILs of MPs treated with aPD-1 and/or aCTLA-4 mAbs (n = 16; right). Results represent the mean of independent experiments. Horizontal bars depict mean values. Error bars indicate SEM. (C) Progression-free survival in MPs treated with aPD-1 and/or aCTLA-4 mAbs, stratified by the ratio of TIGIT to CD226 expression (MFI) by tumor-infiltrated CD25hiFoxp3+ Tregs (cutoff value corresponds to median). n = 16. P values were obtained by Pearson tests (A), unpaired t tests (B), and log-rank test (C). *P < 0.05. ICB, immune checkpoint blockade.

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts