Submit a comment
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune processes are influenced by circadian rhythms. We evaluate the association between varicella vaccine administration time of day and vaccine effectiveness.METHODS A national cohort, children younger than 6 years, were enrolled between January 2002 and December 2023. We compared children vaccinated during morning (7:00–10:59), late morning to afternoon (11:00–15:59), or evening hours (16:00–19:59). A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to adjust for ethnicity, sex, and comorbidities. The first varicella infection occurring at least 14 days after vaccination and a second dose administration were treated as terminal events.RESULTS Of 251,141 vaccinated children, 4,501 (1.8%) experienced breakthrough infections. Infection rates differed based on vaccination time, with the lowest rates associated with late morning to afternoon (11:00–15:59), HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.82–0.95, P < 0.001, and the highest rates with evening vaccination (16:00–19:59), HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.32–1.52, P < 0.001. Vaccination timing remained significant after adjustment for ethnicity, sex, and comorbidities. The association between immunization time and infection risk followed a sinusoidal pattern, consistent with a diurnal rhythm in vaccine effectiveness.CONCLUSION We report a significant association between the time of varicella vaccination and its clinical effectiveness. Similar association was observed with the COVID-19 vaccine, providing proof of concept consistent with a diurnal rhythm in vaccine effectiveness.
Authors
Dana Danino, Yoav Kalron, Jeffrey A. Haspel, Guy Hazan
Guidelines
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.
- Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
- Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
- The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
- No appeals will be considered.
- Comments are not indexed in PubMed.
Specific requirements
- Maximum length, 400 words
- Entered as plain text or HTML
- Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
- Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
- Comments may not include figures
