Submit a comment
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early diagnosis and treatment are key to the long-term survival of lung cancer patients. Although CT has significantly contributed to the early diagnosis of lung cancer, there are still consequences of excessive or delayed treatment. By improving the sensitivity and specificity of circulating tumor cell (CTC) detection, a solution was proposed for differentiating benign from malignant pulmonary nodules.METHODS In this study, we used telomerase reverse transcriptase–based (TERT-based) CTC detection (TBCD) to distinguish benign from malignant pulmonary nodules < 2 cm and compared this method with the pathological diagnosis as the gold standard. FlowSight and FISH were used to confirm the CTCs detected by TBCD.RESULTS Our results suggest that CTCs based on TBCD can be used as independent biomarkers to distinguish benign from malignant nodules and are significantly superior to serum tumor markers. When the detection threshold was 1, the detection sensitivity and specificity of CTC diagnosis were 0.854 and 0.839, respectively. For pulmonary nodules ≤ 1 cm and 1–2 cm, the sensitivity and specificity of CTCs were both higher than 77%. Additionally, the diagnostic ability of CTC-assisted CT was compared by CT detection. The results show that CT combined with CTCs could significantly improve the differentiation ability of benign and malignant nodules in lung nodules < 2 cm and that the sensitivity and specificity could reach 0.899 and 0.839, respectively.CONCLUSION TBCD can effectively diagnose pulmonary nodules and be used as an effective auxiliary diagnostic scheme for CT diagnosis.FUNDING National Key Research and Development Project grant nos. 2019YFC1315700 and 2017YFC1308702, CAMS Initiative for Innovative Medicine grant no. 2017-I2M-1-005, and National Natural Science Foundation of China grant no. 81472013.
Authors
Wen Zhang, Xinchun Duan, Zhenrong Zhang, Zhenrong Yang, Changyun Zhao, Chunzi Liang, Zhidong Liu, Shujun Cheng, Kaitai Zhang
Guidelines
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.
- Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
- Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
- The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
- No appeals will be considered.
- Comments are not indexed in PubMed.
Specific requirements
- Maximum length, 400 words
- Entered as plain text or HTML
- Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
- Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
- Comments may not include figures
