Usage Information

Globalization and changing trends of biomedical research output
Marisa L. Conte, … , Santiago Schnell, M. Bishr Omary
Marisa L. Conte, … , Santiago Schnell, M. Bishr Omary
Published June 15, 2017
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2017;2(12):e95206. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.95206.
View: Text | PDF
Perspective Article has an altmetric score of 273

Globalization and changing trends of biomedical research output

Abstract

The US continues to lead the world in research and development (R&D) expenditures, but there is concern that stagnation in federal support for biomedical research in the US could undermine the leading role the US has played in biomedical and clinical research discoveries. As a readout of research output in the US compared with other countries, assessment of original research articles published by US-based authors in ten clinical and basic science journals during 2000 to 2015 showed a steady decline of articles in high-ranking journals or no significant change in mid-ranking journals. In contrast, publication output originating from China-based investigators, in both high- and mid-ranking journals, has steadily increased commensurate with significant growth in R&D expenditures. These observations support the current concerns of stagnant and year-to-year uncertainty in US federal funding of biomedical research.

Authors

Marisa L. Conte, Jing Liu, Santiago Schnell, M. Bishr Omary

×

Usage data is cumulative from April 2024 through April 2025.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 856 96
PDF 110 15
Figure 99 0
Table 124 0
Supplemental data 62 2
Citation downloads 105 0
Totals 1,356 113
Total Views 1,469
(Click and drag on plot area to zoom in. Click legend items above to toggle)

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement