Usage Information
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune processes are influenced by circadian rhythms. We evaluate the association between varicella vaccine administration time of day and vaccine effectiveness.METHODS A national cohort, children younger than 6 years, were enrolled between January 2002 and December 2023. We compared children vaccinated during morning (7:00–10:59), late morning to afternoon (11:00–15:59), or evening hours (16:00–19:59). A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to adjust for ethnicity, sex, and comorbidities. The first varicella infection occurring at least 14 days after vaccination and a second dose administration were treated as terminal events.RESULTS Of 251,141 vaccinated children, 4,501 (1.8%) experienced breakthrough infections. Infection rates differed based on vaccination time, with the lowest rates associated with late morning to afternoon (11:00–15:59), HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.82–0.95, P < 0.001, and the highest rates with evening vaccination (16:00–19:59), HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.32–1.52, P < 0.001. Vaccination timing remained significant after adjustment for ethnicity, sex, and comorbidities. The association between immunization time and infection risk followed a sinusoidal pattern, consistent with a diurnal rhythm in vaccine effectiveness.CONCLUSION We report a significant association between the time of varicella vaccination and its clinical effectiveness. Similar association was observed with the COVID-19 vaccine, providing proof of concept consistent with a diurnal rhythm in vaccine effectiveness.
Authors
Dana Danino, Yoav Kalron, Jeffrey A. Haspel, Guy Hazan
Usage data is cumulative from March 2025 through March 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,902 | 118 |
| 205 | 30 | |
| Figure | 459 | 1 |
| Table | 94 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 170 | 4 |
| Citation downloads | 216 | 0 |
| Totals | 3,046 | 153 |
| Total Views | 3,199 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
