Abstract
BACKGROUND The level of nasal spike-specific secretory IgA (sIgA) is inversely correlated with the risk of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of intranasal vaccination using Ad5-S-Omicron (NB2155), a replication-incompetent human type 5 adenovirus carrying Omicron BA.1 spike.METHODS An open-label, single-center, investigator-initiated trial was carried out on 128 health care workers who had never been infected with SARS-CoV-2 and had previously received 2 or 3 injections of inactivated whole-virus vaccines, with the last dose given 3–19 months previously (median 387 days, IQR 333–404 days). Participants received 2 intranasal sprays of NB2155 at 28-day intervals between November 30 and December 30, 2022. Safety was evaluated by solicited adverse events and laboratory tests. The elevation of nasal mucosal spike-specific sIgA and serum neutralizing activities were assessed. All participants were monitored for infection by antigen tests, disease symptoms, and the elevation of nucleocapsid-specific sIgA in the nasal passage.RESULTS The vaccine-related solicited adverse events were mild. Nasal spike-specific sIgA against 10 strains had a mean geometric mean fold increase of 4.5 after the first dose, but it increased much higher to 51.5 after the second dose. Serum neutralizing titers also increased modestly to 128.1 (95% CI 74.4–220.4) against authentic BA.1 and 76.9 (95% CI 45.4–130.2) against BA.5 at 14 days after the second dose. Due to the lifting of the zero-COVID policy in China on December 7, 2022, 57.3% of participants were infected with BA.5 between days 15 and 28 after the first dose, whereas no participants reported having any symptomatic infections between day 3 and day 90 after the second dose. The elevation of nasal nucleocapsid-specific sIgA on days 0, 14, 42, and 118 after the first dose was assessed to verify that these 2-dose participants had no asymptomatic infections.CONCLUSION A 2-dose intranasal vaccination regimen using NB2155 was safe, was well tolerated, and could dramatically induce broad-spectrum spike-specific sIgA in the nasal passage. Preliminary data suggested that the intranasal vaccination may establish an effective mucosal immune barrier against infection and warranted further clinical studies.TRIAL REGISTRATION Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300070346).FUNDING Natural Science Foundation of China, Guangzhou Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University.
Authors
Baoqing Sun, Qian Wang, Peiyan Zheng, Xuefeng Niu, Ying Feng, Weijie Guan, Si Chen, Jin Li, Tingting Cui, Yijun Deng, Zhangkai J. Cheng, Yongmei Li, Xinke Zhou, Yi Fang, Wei Wang, Zhongfang Wang, Ling Chen, Nanshan Zhong
Figure 2
Solicited adverse events following intranasal vaccination.
