BACKGROUND COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) virus-specific antibody levels that translate into recipient posttransfusion antibody levels sufficient to prevent disease progression are not defined.METHODS This secondary analysis correlated donor and recipient antibody levels to hospitalization risk among unvaccinated, seronegative CCP recipients within the outpatient, double-blind, randomized clinical trial that compared CCP to control plasma. The majority of COVID-19 CCP arm hospitalizations (15/17, 88%) occurred in this unvaccinated, seronegative subgroup. A functional cutoff to delineate recipient high versus low posttransfusion antibody levels was established by 2 methods: (i) analyzing virus neutralization–equivalent anti–Spike receptor-binding domain immunoglobulin G (anti-S-RBD IgG) responses in donors or (ii) receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.RESULTS SARS-CoV-2 anti–S-RBD IgG antibody was volume diluted 21.3-fold into posttransfusion seronegative recipients from matched donor units. Virus-specific antibody delivered was approximately 1.2 mg. The high-antibody recipients transfused early (symptom onset within 5 days) had no hospitalizations. A CCP-recipient analysis for antibody thresholds correlated to reduced hospitalizations found a statistical significant association between early transfusion and high antibodies versus all other CCP recipients (or control plasma), with antibody cutoffs established by both methods-donor-based virus neutralization cutoffs in posttransfusion recipients (0/85 [0%] versus 15/276 [5.6%]; P = 0.03) or ROC-based cutoff (0/94 [0%] versus 15/267 [5.4%]; P = 0.01).CONCLUSION In unvaccinated, seronegative CCP recipients, early transfusion of plasma units in the upper 30% of study donors’ antibody levels reduced outpatient hospitalizations. High antibody level plasma units, given early, should be reserved for therapeutic use.TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04373460.FUNDING Department of Defense (W911QY2090012); Defense Health Agency; Bloomberg Philanthropies; the State of Maryland; NIH (3R01AI152078-01S1, U24TR001609-S3, 1K23HL151826NIH); the Mental Wellness Foundation; the Moriah Fund; Octapharma; the Healthnetwork Foundation; the Shear Family Foundation; the NorthShore Research Institute; and the Rice Foundation.
Han-Sol Park, Anna Yin, Caelan Barranta, John S. Lee, Christopher A. Caputo, Jaiprasath Sachithanandham, Maggie Li, Steve Yoon, Ioannis Sitaras, Anne Jedlicka, Yolanda Eby, Malathi Ram, Reinaldo E. Fernandez, Owen R. Baker, Aarthi G. Shenoy, Giselle S. Mosnaim, Yuriko Fukuta, Bela Patel, Sonya L. Heath, Adam C. Levine, Barry R. Meisenberg, Emily S. Spivak, Shweta Anjan, Moises A. Huaman, Janis E. Blair, Judith S. Currier, James H. Paxton, Jonathan M. Gerber, Joann R. Petrini, Patrick B. Broderick, William Rausch, Marie Elena Cordisco, Jean Hammel, Benjamin Greenblatt, Valerie C. Cluzet, Daniel Cruser, Kevin Oei, Matthew Abinante, Laura L. Hammitt, Catherine G. Sutcliffe, Donald N. Forthal, Martin S. Zand, Edward R. Cachay, Jay S. Raval, Seble G. Kassaye, Christi E. Marshall, Anusha Yarava, Karen Lane, Nichol A. McBee, Amy L. Gawad, Nicky Karlen, Atika Singh, Daniel E. Ford, Douglas A. Jabs, Lawrence J. Appel, David M. Shade, Bryan Lau, Stephan Ehrhardt, Sheriza N. Baksh, Janna R. Shapiro, Jiangda Ou, Yu Bin Na, Maria D. Knoll, Elysse Ornelas-Gatdula, Netzahualcoyotl Arroyo-Curras, Thomas J. Gniadek, Patrizio Caturegli, Jinke Wu, Nelson Ndahiro, Michael J. Betenbaugh, Alyssa Ziman, Daniel F. Hanley, Arturo Casadevall, Shmuel Shoham, Evan M. Bloch, Kelly A. Gebo, Aaron A.R. Tobian, Oliver Laeyendecker, Andrew Pekosz, Sabra L. Klein, David J. Sullivan
Usage data is cumulative from March 2024 through January 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 1,703 | 121 |
404 | 57 | |
Figure | 143 | 1 |
Table | 49 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 142 | 4 |
Citation downloads | 102 | 0 |
Totals | 2,543 | 183 |
Total Views | 2,726 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.