Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Predictors of HIV rebound differ by timing of antiretroviral therapy initiation
Jonathan Z. Li, … , Davey M. Smith, for the AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5345 Study Team
Jonathan Z. Li, … , Davey M. Smith, for the AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5345 Study Team
Published February 8, 2024
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2024;9(3):e173864. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.173864.
View: Text | PDF
Clinical Research and Public Health AIDS/HIV

Predictors of HIV rebound differ by timing of antiretroviral therapy initiation

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

BACKGROUND Identifying factors that predict the timing of HIV rebound after treatment interruption will be crucial for designing and evaluating interventions for HIV remission.METHODS We performed a broad evaluation of viral and immune factors that predict viral rebound (AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5345). Participants initiated antiretroviral therapy (ART) during chronic (N = 33) or early (N = 12) HIV infection with ≥ 2 years of suppressive ART and restarted ART if they had 2 viral loads ≥ 1,000 copies/mL after treatment interruption.RESULTS Compared with chronic-treated participants, early-treated individuals had smaller and fewer transcriptionally active HIV reservoirs. A higher percentage of HIV Gag-specific CD8+ T cell cytotoxic response was associated with lower intact proviral DNA. Predictors of HIV rebound timing differed between early- versus chronic-treated participants, as the strongest reservoir predictor of time to HIV rebound was level of residual viremia in early-treated participants and intact DNA level in chronic-treated individuals. We also identified distinct sets of pre–treatment interruption viral, immune, and inflammatory markers that differentiated participants who had rapid versus slow rebound.CONCLUSION The results provide an in-depth overview of the complex interplay of viral, immunologic, and inflammatory predictors of viral rebound and demonstrate that the timing of ART initiation modifies the features of rapid and slow viral rebound.TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03001128FUNDING NIH National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Merck

Authors

Jonathan Z. Li, Meghan Melberg, Autumn Kittilson, Mohamed Abdel-Mohsen, Yijia Li, Evgenia Aga, Ronald J. Bosch, Elizabeth R. Wonderlich, Jennifer Kinslow, Leila B. Giron, Clara Di Germanio, Mark Pilkinton, Lynsay MacLaren, Michael Keefer, Lawrence Fox, Liz Barr, Edward Acosta, Jintanat Ananworanich, Robert Coombs, John Mellors, Steven Deeks, Rajesh T. Gandhi, Michael Busch, Alan Landay, Bernard Macatangay, Davey M. Smith, for the AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5345 Study Team

×

Figure 2

HIV reservoir comparison between early- and chronic-treated participants.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
HIV reservoir comparison between early- and chronic-treated participants...
Unspliced cell-associated HIV RNA, total HIV DNA by the intact proviral DNA assay (IPDA), intact proviral DNA (IPD) by the IPDA, and infectious units per million resting CD4+ cells (IUPM) by the differentiation quantitative viral outgrowth assay (dQVOA). Open circles represent values that are below the limit of quantification. Median lines and fold-change between early- and chronic-treated participants are shown. P values by the Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts