Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Gaps between college and starting an MD-PhD program are adding years to physician-scientist training time
Lawrence F. Brass, … , Reiko Maki Fitzsimonds, Myles H. Akabas
Lawrence F. Brass, … , Reiko Maki Fitzsimonds, Myles H. Akabas
Published March 22, 2022
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2022;7(6):e156168. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.156168.
View: Text | PDF
Perspective Physician-Scientist Development Aging

Gaps between college and starting an MD-PhD program are adding years to physician-scientist training time

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The average age when physician-scientists begin their career has been rising. Here, we focused on one contributor to this change: the increasingly common decision by candidates to postpone applying to MD-PhD programs until after college. This creates a time gap between college and medical school. Data were obtained from 3544 trainees in 73 programs, 72 program directors, and AAMC databases. From 2013 to 2020, the prevalence of gaps rose from 53% to 75%, with the time usually spent doing research. Gap prevalence for MD students also increased but not to the same extent and for different reasons. Differences by gender, underrepresented status, and program size were minimal. Most candidates who took a gap did so because they believed it would improve their chances of admission, but gaps were as common among those not accepted to MD-PhD programs as among those who were. Many program directors preferred candidates with gaps, believing without evidence that gaps reflects greater commitment. Although candidates with gaps were more likely to have a publication at the time of admission, gaps were not associated with a shorter time to degree nor have they been shown to improve outcomes. Together, these observations raise concerns that, by promoting gaps after college, current admissions practices have had unintended consequences without commensurate advantages.

Authors

Lawrence F. Brass, Reiko Maki Fitzsimonds, Myles H. Akabas

×

Figure 3

Extent of research experiences during college and likelihood of having publications at the time of MD-PhD application by gap duration.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Extent of research experiences during college and likelihood of having p...
Survey respondents were divided into those with no gap (n = 1196), a 1- to 2-year gap (n = 1719), and a gap of ≥3 years (n = 629). (A–D) Comparison of women (n = 1574) and men (n = 1923). (E–H) Comparison of those from groups considered to be underrepresented in medicine (UIM) (n = 545) to those who are not (non-UIM) (n = 2868). (A and E) Average number of semesters of research during college. (B and F) Percentage of those surveyed who reported a summer research experience between freshman and sophomore years. (C and G) Average number of summers of research. (D and H) Percentage of those surveyed who reported having a publication at the time of submission of their MD-PhD program application.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts