Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Top read articles
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccine–induced humoral response and reactogenicity in individuals with prior COVID-19 disease
Steven G. Kelsen, … , Michael R. Ruggieri Sr., Nina T. Gentile
Steven G. Kelsen, … , Michael R. Ruggieri Sr., Nina T. Gentile
Published January 12, 2022
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2022;7(4):e155889. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.155889.
View: Text | PDF
Clinical Medicine COVID-19

SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccine–induced humoral response and reactogenicity in individuals with prior COVID-19 disease

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

BACKGROUND Most individuals with prior COVID-19 disease manifest long-term protective immune responses against reinfection. Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that humoral immune and reactogenicity responses to a SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine differ in individuals with and without prior COVID-19 disease.METHODS Health care workers (n = 61) with (n = 30) and without (n = 31) prior COVID-19 disease received two 30 μg doses of Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine 3 weeks apart. Serum IgG antibody against the spike receptor-binding domain; serum neutralizing activity; and vaccine reactogenicity were assessed longitudinally every 2 weeks for 56 days after the first injection.RESULTS The COVID-19 group manifested more rapid increases in spike IgG antibody and serum neutralizing activity after the first vaccine dose but showed little or no increase after the second dose compared with the infection-naive group. In fact, spike IgG was at its maximum level after the first dose in 36% of the COVID-19 group versus 0% of the infection-naive group. Peak IgG antibody levels were lower but appeared to fall more slowly in the COVID-19 group versus the infection-naive group. Finally, adverse systemic reactions, e.g., fever, headache, and malaise, were more frequent and lasted longer after both the first and second injection in the COVID-19 group than in the infection-naive group.CONCLUSION Individuals with prior COVID-19 disease demonstrate a robust, accelerated humoral immune response to the first dose but an attenuated response to the second dose of BNT162b2 vaccine compared with controls. The COVID-19 group also experienced greater reactogenicity. Humoral responses and reactogenicity to BNT162b2 differ qualitatively and quantitatively in individuals with prior COVID-19 disease compared with infection-naive individuals.FUNDING This work was supported by Temple University institutional funds.

Authors

Steven G. Kelsen, Alan S. Braverman, Mark O. Aksoy, Jacob A. Hayman, Puja S. Patel, Charu Rajput, Huaqing Zhao, Susan G. Fisher, Michael R. Ruggieri Sr., Nina T. Gentile

×

Figure 1

Spike RBD IgG antibody responses to the BNT162b2 vaccine in COVID-19 and control groups.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Spike RBD IgG antibody responses to the BNT162b2 vaccine in COVID-19 and...
(A) Group mean ± 1 SEM responses. Vertical arrow indicates time of second vaccine injection. Note that the time course of spike RBD IgG antibody response to vaccination was significantly different between COVID-19 and control groups (P < 0.0001; linear mixed-effects model for repeated measures). Differences in spike IgG antibody levels were significant prevaccine (P < 0.0003) and at day 14 (**P < 0.0002). However, spike IgG levels were similar at days 28, 42, and 56 (P > 0.10 for all 3 comparisons). Sample size in the COVID-19 group was as follows: day 14 (n = 25), day 28 (n = 28), day 42 (n = 28); and day 56 (n = 28). Sample size in the control group was as follows: day 14 (n = 25), day 28 (n = 28), day 42 (n = 30), and day 56 (n = 31). (B) Spike RBD IgG antibody responses to vaccine in individuals with prior COVID-19 disease and control individuals. Note the considerable interindividual variability in both groups.

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts