Usage Information
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2021;6(12):e147703. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.147703.
Abstract
Single-cell sequencing studies have characterized the transcriptomic signature of cell types within the kidney. However, the spatial distribution of acute kidney injury (AKI) is regional and affects cells heterogeneously. We first optimized coordination of spatial transcriptomics and single-nuclear sequencing data sets, mapping 30 dominant cell types to a human nephrectomy. The predicted cell-type spots corresponded with the underlying histopathology. To study the implications of AKI on transcript expression, we then characterized the spatial transcriptomic signature of 2 murine AKI models: ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI) and cecal ligation puncture (CLP). Localized regions of reduced overall expression were associated with injury pathways. Using single-cell sequencing, we deconvoluted the signature of each spatial transcriptomic spot, identifying patterns of colocalization between immune and epithelial cells. Neutrophils infiltrated the renal medulla in the ischemia model. Atf3 was identified as a chemotactic factor in S3 proximal tubules. In the CLP model, infiltrating macrophages dominated the outer cortical signature, and Mdk was identified as a corresponding chemotactic factor. The regional distribution of these immune cells was validated with multiplexed CO-Detection by indEXing (CODEX) immunofluorescence. Spatial transcriptomic sequencing complemented single-cell sequencing by uncovering mechanisms driving immune cell infiltration and detection of relevant cell subpopulations.
Authors
Ricardo Melo Ferreira, Angela R. Sabo, Seth Winfree, Kimberly S. Collins, Danielle Janosevic, Connor J. Gulbronson, Ying-Hua Cheng, Lauren Casbon, Daria Barwinska, Michael J. Ferkowicz, Xiaoling Xuei, Chi Zhang, Kenneth W. Dunn, Katherine J. Kelly, Timothy A. Sutton, Takashi Hato, Pierre C. Dagher, Tarek M. El-Achkar, Michael T. Eadon
Usage data is cumulative from December 2023 through December 2024.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 3,397 | 2,125 |
| 284 | 392 | |
| Figure | 1,110 | 31 |
| Supplemental data | 170 | 86 |
| Citation downloads | 126 | 0 |
| Totals | 5,087 | 2,634 |
| Total Views | 7,721 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
