Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Top read articles
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Mind the gap: Expediting gender parity in MD-PhD admissions
Temperance R. Rowell, … , Donna S. Neuberg, Loren D. Walensky
Temperance R. Rowell, … , Donna S. Neuberg, Loren D. Walensky
Published February 27, 2020
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2020;5(4):e136037. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.136037.
View: Text | PDF
Perspective

Mind the gap: Expediting gender parity in MD-PhD admissions

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The 2018 National MD-PhD Program Outcomes Study highlighted the critical need to increase MD-PhD trainee diversity and close the gender gap in MD-PhD enrollment. This Association of American Medical Colleges imperative prompted us to evaluate trends in female matriculation from our institutional MD-PhD program compared with national data. Based on a 10-year review of Harvard/MIT Medical Scientist Training Program admissions, we observed a sharp and sustained increase in female matriculants for the past 5 years that is well above the national average. We report our experience with achieving gender parity among matriculants of our MD-PhD program, identify the specific stage of the admissions process where the gender balance acutely shifted, and attribute the increase in female matriculation to concrete administrative changes that were put into place just prior to the observed gender balance shift. These changes included increasing the number of faculty participants in application screening and awardee selection and establishing gender balance among faculty decision makers. We believe that adopting basic administrative practices geared toward increasing the diversity of perspectives among admissions faculty has the potential to expedite gender parity of MD-PhD matriculants nationwide and could eventually help achieve gender balance in the national physician-scientist workforce.

Authors

Temperance R. Rowell, Robert A. Redd, Donna S. Neuberg, Loren D. Walensky

×

Figure 2

The gender disparity among applicants to the Harvard/MIT MSTP tracks the national data.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
The gender disparity among applicants to the Harvard/MIT MSTP tracks the...
(A) The national average for percentage of female MD-PhD applicants from AY2010–2011 to AY2018–2019 based on data from the AAMC was plotted (Actual, black circles connected by solid line). A 3-year rolling mean (Smooth) was applied to the 9-year data set to match the handling of the Harvard/MIT program data. The smoothed data were plotted (white circles) and fit using a linear regression to obtain the slope (black dashed line). (B) The percentage of female applicants to the Harvard/MIT MSTP was plotted from AY2010–2011 to AY2019–2020 (Actual, crimson circles connected by solid line). A 3-year rolling mean was used to smooth yearly variation in the Harvard/MIT data. Smoothed data were plotted (white circles) and fit using a linear regression to calculate the slope (dashed crimson line) for comparison to the national data. n = 1703–1937 applicants (both genders) per AY nationally and n = 609–714 applicants (both genders) per AY for the Harvard/MIT MSTP.

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts