Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Transcriptional trajectories of human kidney injury progression
Pietro E. Cippà, Bo Sun, Jing Liu, Liang Chen, Maarten Naesens, Andrew P. McMahon
Pietro E. Cippà, Bo Sun, Jing Liu, Liang Chen, Maarten Naesens, Andrew P. McMahon
View: Text | PDF
Clinical Research and Public Health Nephrology Transplantation

Transcriptional trajectories of human kidney injury progression

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

BACKGROUND. The molecular understanding of the progression from acute to chronic organ injury is limited. Ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI) triggered during kidney transplantation can contribute to progressive allograft dysfunction. METHODS. Protocol biopsies (n = 163) were obtained from 42 kidney allografts at 4 time points after transplantation. RNA sequencing–mediated (RNA-seq–mediated) transcriptional profiling and machine learning computational approaches were employed to analyze the molecular responses to IRI and to identify shared and divergent transcriptional trajectories associated with distinct clinical outcomes. The data were compared with the response to IRI in a mouse model of the acute to chronic kidney injury transition. RESULTS. In the first hours after reperfusion, all patients exhibited a similar transcriptional program under the control of immediate-early response genes. In the following months, we identified 2 main transcriptional trajectories leading to kidney recovery or to sustained injury with associated fibrosis and renal dysfunction. The molecular map generated by this computational approach highlighted early markers of kidney disease progression and delineated transcriptional programs associated with the transition to chronic injury. The characterization of a similar process in a mouse IRI model extended the relevance of our findings beyond transplantation. CONCLUSIONS. The integration of multiple transcriptomes from serial biopsies with advanced computational algorithms overcame the analytical hurdles related to variability between individuals and identified shared transcriptional elements of kidney disease progression in humans, which may prove as useful predictors of disease progression following kidney transplantation and kidney injury. This generally applicable approach opens the way for an unbiased analysis of human disease progression. FUNDING. The study was supported by the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine and by the Swiss National Science Foundation.

Authors

Pietro E. Cippà, Bo Sun, Jing Liu, Liang Chen, Maarten Naesens, Andrew P. McMahon

×

Figure 4

Early markers of transition to kidney fibrosis.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Early markers of transition to kidney fibrosis.
(A) Schematic representa...
(A) Schematic representation of the definition of groups along the divergent branches of the pseudotime analysis presented in Figure 3C. (B–E) Box plots of RPKM values of the indicated genes in the group defined in A and PRE biopsies obtained from living donor (LD), as a surrogate of normal renal tissue. The groups were compared by Mann-Whitney U test. (F) Expression profile of EP300 along the pseudotime presented in Figure 3E in comparison with other genes, reflecting the very early upregulation of EP300 along the transition to chronic kidney injury. (G) Samples cluster analysis based on the 33 genes highly correlated with EP300 in groups 1 and 2 (Pearson’s correlation > 0.88). The division of the samples in 2 clusters is indicated by the blue (group 1) and green (group 2) bars on the left. (H) Conceptual summary of the study highlighting the common early injury response after ischemia/reperfusion followed by a multifactorial transition phase with divergent long-term outcomes: recovery versus the initiation of a chronic injury signature. Some of the critical genes involved in each phase are shown.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts