Clinical evidence-based cutoff limits for GH stimulation tests in children with a backup of results with reference to mass spectrometry
IV Wagner, C Paetzold, R Gausche… - European Journal of …, 2014 - academic.oup.com
European Journal of Endocrinology, 2014•academic.oup.com
Context Cutoff limits of GH stimulation tests to diagnose GH deficiency (GHD) in children and
adolescents are not sufficiently validated by clinical studies due to discrepancies in the
performance of GH immunoassays and lack of available study populations. Objective We
aimed to establish new cutoff limits for GH stimulation tests based on clinical evidence and
compared these immunoassay-based values with an antibody-independent mass
spectrometric method. Design and setting In a retrospective study, GH cutoff limits for eight …
adolescents are not sufficiently validated by clinical studies due to discrepancies in the
performance of GH immunoassays and lack of available study populations. Objective We
aimed to establish new cutoff limits for GH stimulation tests based on clinical evidence and
compared these immunoassay-based values with an antibody-independent mass
spectrometric method. Design and setting In a retrospective study, GH cutoff limits for eight …
Context
Cutoff limits of GH stimulation tests to diagnose GH deficiency (GHD) in children and adolescents are not sufficiently validated by clinical studies due to discrepancies in the performance of GH immunoassays and lack of available study populations.
Objective
We aimed to establish new cutoff limits for GH stimulation tests based on clinical evidence and compared these immunoassay-based values with an antibody-independent mass spectrometric method.
Design and setting
In a retrospective study, GH cutoff limits for eight different immunoassays and isotope dilution mass spectrometry (ID-MS) were calculated from hGH peak concentrations of short-statured children with and without GHD.
Patients
We compared the serum GH peak concentrations at GH stimulation test of 52 short-statured children and adolescents, who have normal GH secretion at initial workup and normal growth in the follow-up, with the serum GH peak concentrations of 44 GHD patients in the same age range, in order to optimize the cutoff limit calculation.
Results
Discriminant analysis of re-measured GH led to a new cutoff limit of 7.09 μg/l using the iSYS assay (IDS) and the limits for the other seven hGH assays varied between 4.32 and 7.77 μg/l. For ID-MS, cutoffs of 5.48 μg/l (22k GH) and 7.43 μg/l (total GH) were ascertained.
Conclusion
The establishment of method-specific clinical evidence-based GH cutoff limits is of importance to ensure adequate clinical diagnosis and treatment of children and adolescents with GHD. ID-MS may become an important tool for providing both reliable and sustainable SI traceability of GH measurements in the future.
Oxford University Press