Cilostazol exerts antiplatelet and anti‐inflammatory effects through AMPK activation and NF‐kB inhibition on hypercholesterolemic rats

NAV da Motta, FCF de Brito - Fundamental & clinical …, 2016 - Wiley Online Library
NAV da Motta, FCF de Brito
Fundamental & clinical pharmacology, 2016Wiley Online Library
This work presents a model of rats fed a high‐cholesterol diet, receiving a long‐term oral
administration of cilostazol, a PDE 3‐inhibitor. The aim of this study was to evaluate the
molecular mechanisms by which cilostazol interferes with platelets signaling pathways to
avoid atherosclerosis early development. Male Wistar rats were divided into 3 groups:
Control group received standard rat chow (C), hypercholesterolemic group (HCD), and
HCD+ CIL (cilostazol group) received hypercholesterolemic diet for 45 days. HCD+ CIL …
Abstract
This work presents a model of rats fed a high‐cholesterol diet, receiving a long‐term oral administration of cilostazol, a PDE3‐inhibitor. The aim of this study was to evaluate the molecular mechanisms by which cilostazol interferes with platelets signaling pathways to avoid atherosclerosis early development. Male Wistar rats were divided into 3 groups: Control group received standard rat chow (C), hypercholesterolemic group (HCD), and HCD+CIL (cilostazol group) received hypercholesterolemic diet for 45 days. HCD+CIL group received cilostazol (30 mg/kg/p.o.) once daily in the last 15 days. Platelet aggregation, lipid profile, lipid peroxidation, and cytokine serum levels were assessed. Expression of P‐selectin, CD40L, PKC‐α, IkB‐α, and iNOS and activation of AMPK, NF‐κB, and eNOS in the platelets were assessed using Western blot analysis. Cilostazol reduced the levels of total cholesterol (361.0 ± 12.8 vs. 111.5 ± 1.6 mg/dL), triglycerides (186.9 ± 17.7 vs. 55.4 ±3.1 mg/dL), cLDL (330.9 ± 9.7 vs. 61.5 ± 3.5 mg/dL), cVLDL (45.0 ± 4.6 vs. 11.1 ± 0.6 mg/dL), and malondialdehyde (9.4 ± 0.5 vs. 3.2 ± 0.3 nmol/mL) compared to the HCD group. Cilostazol presented antiplatelet properties and decreased inflammatory markers levels. These effects seem to be related to AMPK activation, NF‐kB inhibition, and eNOS activation.
Wiley Online Library