Immune responses in Ugandan women infected with subtypes A and D HIV using the BED capture immunoassay and an antibody avidity assay

AF Longosz, CS Morrison, PL Chen, E Arts… - JAIDS Journal of …, 2014 - journals.lww.com
AF Longosz, CS Morrison, PL Chen, E Arts, I Nankya, RA Salata, V Franco, TC Quinn
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2014journals.lww.com
Materials and Methods: Samples (N= 2614) were obtained from 114 women aged 18–45
years in the Ugandan Genital Shedding and Disease Progression Study cohort (2001–2009;
82 subtype A, 32 subtype D; median 23 samples/women, range 3–41 samples, median
follow-up of 6.6 years). Samples were analyzed using the BED capture immunoassay (cutoff,
0.8 OD-n) and the avidity assay (cutoff, 90% Avidity Index). Antibody maturation was
assessed by having the BED capture enzyme immunoassay (BED-CEIA) or avidity value …
Materials and Methods:
Samples (N= 2614) were obtained from 114 women aged 18–45 years in the Ugandan Genital Shedding and Disease Progression Study cohort (2001–2009; 82 subtype A, 32 subtype D; median 23 samples/women, range 3–41 samples, median follow-up of 6.6 years). Samples were analyzed using the BED capture immunoassay (cutoff, 0.8 OD-n) and the avidity assay (cutoff, 90% Avidity Index). Antibody maturation was assessed by having the BED capture enzyme immunoassay (BED-CEIA) or avidity value exceed the assay cutoff 1 or 2 years after infection. The waning antibody response was measured by having the BED-CEIA or avidity value fall> 20% below the maximum value.
Results:
For the BED-CEIA, 8 women with subtype A infection and 3 women with subtype D infection never progressed previously the cutoff value (median, 5.9 years follow-up after infection). Six women with subtype D infection never achieved an avidity index> 90%. Subtype did not impact the proportion of women whose assay values regressed by> 20% of the maximal value (for BED-CEIA: 33% for A, 41% for D, P= 0.51; for avidity: 1% for A, 6% for D, P= 0.19).
Discussion:
The higher frequency of misclassification of individuals with long-term subtype D infection as recently infected using serologic incidence assays reflects a weak initial antibody response to HIV infection that is sustained over time.
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins