The anti-DNA antibody: origin and impact, dogmas and controversies
OP Rekvig - Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 2015 - nature.com
OP Rekvig
Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 2015•nature.comThe inclusion of'the anti-DNA antibody'by the ACR and the Systemic Lupus International
Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) as a criterion for systemic lupus erythematosus does not
convey the diverse origins of these antibodies, whether their production is transient or
persistent (which is heavily influenced by the nature of the inducing antigens), the
specificities exerted by these antibodies or their clinical impact—or lack thereof. A
substantial amount of data not considered in clinical medicine could be added from basic …
Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) as a criterion for systemic lupus erythematosus does not
convey the diverse origins of these antibodies, whether their production is transient or
persistent (which is heavily influenced by the nature of the inducing antigens), the
specificities exerted by these antibodies or their clinical impact—or lack thereof. A
substantial amount of data not considered in clinical medicine could be added from basic …
Abstract
The inclusion of 'the anti-DNA antibody' by the ACR and the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) as a criterion for systemic lupus erythematosus does not convey the diverse origins of these antibodies, whether their production is transient or persistent (which is heavily influenced by the nature of the inducing antigens), the specificities exerted by these antibodies or their clinical impact—or lack thereof. A substantial amount of data not considered in clinical medicine could be added from basic immunology evidence, which could change the paradigms linked to what 'the anti-DNA antibody' is, in a pathogenic, classification or diagnostic context.
nature.com