Impact of C-peptide status on the response of glucagon and endogenous glucose production to induced hypoglycemia in T1DM

S Zenz, JK Mader, W Regittnig… - The Journal of …, 2018 - academic.oup.com
S Zenz, JK Mader, W Regittnig, M Brunner, S Korsatko, B Boulgaropoulos, C Magnes
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2018academic.oup.com
Context Complete loss of β-cell function in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) may
lead to an increased risk of severe hypoglycemia. Objective We aimed to determine the
impact of C-peptide status on glucagon response and endogenous glucose production
(EGP) during hypoglycemia in patients with T1DM. Design and Setting We conducted an
open, comparative trial. Patients Ten C-peptide positive (C-pos) and 11 matched C-peptide
negative (C-neg) patients with T1DM were enrolled. Intervention Plasma glucose was …
Context
Complete loss of β-cell function in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) may lead to an increased risk of severe hypoglycemia.
Objective
We aimed to determine the impact of C-peptide status on glucagon response and endogenous glucose production (EGP) during hypoglycemia in patients with T1DM.
Design and Setting
We conducted an open, comparative trial.
Patients
Ten C-peptide positive (C-pos) and 11 matched C-peptide negative (C-neg) patients with T1DM were enrolled.
Intervention
Plasma glucose was normalized over the night fast, and after a steady-state (baseline) plateau all patients underwent a hyperinsulinemic, stepwise hypoglycemic clamp with glucose plateaus of 5.5, 3.5, and 2.5 mmol/L and a recovery phase of 4.0 mmol/L. Blood glucagon was measured with a specific and highly sensitive glucagon assay. EGP was determined with a stable isotope tracer technique.
Main Outcome Measure
Impact of C-peptide status on glucagon response and EGP during hypoglycemia.
Results
Glucagon concentrations were significantly lower in C-pos and C-neg patients than previously reported. At baseline, C-pos patients had higher glucagon concentrations than C-neg patients (8.39 ± 4.6 vs 4.19 ± 2.4 pmol/L, P = 0.016, mean ± standard deviation) but comparable EGP rates (2.13 ± 0.2 vs 2.04 ± 0.3 mg/kg/min, P < 0.391). In both groups, insulin suppressed glucagon levels, but hypoglycemia revealed significantly higher glucagon concentrations in C-pos than in C-neg patients. EGP was significantly higher in C-pos patients at hypoglycemia (2.5 mmol/L) compared with C-neg patients.
Conclusions
Glucagon concentrations and EGP during hypoglycemia were more pronounced in C-pos than in C-neg patients, which indicates that preserved β-cell function may contribute to counterregulation during hypoglycemia in patients with T1DM.
Oxford University Press