[HTML][HTML] Effect of spironolactone on atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: post-hoc analysis of the randomized, placebo …

J Neefs, NWE van den Berg, SPJ Krul… - American Journal of …, 2020 - Springer
J Neefs, NWE van den Berg, SPJ Krul, SM Boekholdt, JR de Groot
American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs, 2020Springer
Abstract Background Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) reduce the risk of atrial
fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure (HF) and a reduced ejection fraction. The efficacy
of MRAs for AF prevention in patients with HF and a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is
unclear. Objectives We performed a secondary analysis of a randomized placebo-controlled
trial to determine the efficacy of spironolactone in reducing new-onset AF and recurrence of
AF in 2733 patients with symptomatic HFpEF. Methods Patients with and without prevalent …
Background
Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) reduce the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure (HF) and a reduced ejection fraction. The efficacy of MRAs for AF prevention in patients with HF and a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is unclear.
Objectives
We performed a secondary analysis of a randomized placebo-controlled trial to determine the efficacy of spironolactone in reducing new-onset AF and recurrence of AF in 2733 patients with symptomatic HFpEF.
Methods
Patients with and without prevalent AF at baseline were included, and those with permanent AF were excluded. Patients were randomized 1:1 to spironolactone or placebo. The risk of new-onset AF or the recurrence of AF was quantified using hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results
At baseline, 2228 (64.7%) patients had no history of AF (spironolactone, n = 1111; placebo, n = 1117), whereas 505 (18.4%) patients had prevalent AF (spironolactone, n = 260; placebo, n = 245). During a median follow-up of 3.1 years (interquartile range [IQR] 2.0–4.9), the incidence of new-onset AF was similar in both treatment arms: spironolactone 5.2% (n = 58) versus placebo 4.4% (n = 49); p = 0.41. The risk of new-onset AF was similar in both treatment arms: HR 1.19; 95% CI 0.81–1.74; p = 0.38. AF recurrence was also similar in both treatment arms during a median follow-up of 3.3 years (IQR 1.9–4.7): spironolactone 11.5% (n = 30) versus placebo 11.8% (n = 29); p = 1.00. The risk of recurrence of AF did not differ per treatment arm: HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.57–1.58; p = 0.83.
Conclusion
Spironolactone does not reduce the risk of new-onset AF or AF recurrence in patients with HFpEF. This is in contrast to results in cohorts of patients with HF and a reduced ejection fraction.
Clinical trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier no. NCT00094302 (TOPCAT).
Springer