Association of viral suppression with lower AIDS-defining and non–AIDS-defining cancer incidence in HIV-infected veterans: A prospective cohort study

LS Park, JP Tate, K Sigel, ST Brown… - Annals of internal …, 2018 - acpjournals.org
LS Park, JP Tate, K Sigel, ST Brown, K Crothers, C Gibert, MB Goetz, D Rimland
Annals of internal medicine, 2018acpjournals.org
Background: Viral suppression is a primary marker of HIV treatment success. Persons with
HIV are at increased risk for AIDS-defining cancer (ADC) and several types of non–AIDS-
defining cancer (NADC), some of which are caused by oncogenic viruses. Objective: To
determine whether viral suppression is associated with decreased cancer risk. Design:
Prospective cohort. Setting: Department of Veterans Affairs. Participants: HIV-positive
veterans (n= 42 441) and demographically matched uninfected veterans (n= 104 712) from …
Background
Viral suppression is a primary marker of HIV treatment success. Persons with HIV are at increased risk for AIDS-defining cancer (ADC) and several types of non–AIDS-defining cancer (NADC), some of which are caused by oncogenic viruses.
Objective
To determine whether viral suppression is associated with decreased cancer risk.
Design
Prospective cohort.
Setting
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Participants
HIV-positive veterans (n = 42 441) and demographically matched uninfected veterans (n = 104 712) from 1999 to 2015.
Measurements
Standardized cancer incidence rates and Poisson regression rate ratios (RRs; HIV-positive vs. uninfected persons) by viral suppression status (unsuppressed: person-time with HIV RNA levels ≥500 copies/mL; early suppression: initial 2 years with HIV RNA levels <500 copies/mL; long-term suppression: person-time after early suppression with HIV RNA levels <500 copies/mL).
Results
Cancer incidence for HIV-positive versus uninfected persons was highest for unsuppressed persons (RR, 2.35 [95% CI, 2.19 to 2.51]), lower among persons with early suppression (RR, 1.99 [CI, 1.87 to 2.12]), and lowest among persons with long-term suppression (RR, 1.52 [CI, 1.44 to 1.61]). This trend was strongest for ADC (unsuppressed: RR, 22.73 [CI, 19.01 to 27.19]; early suppression: RR, 9.48 [CI, 7.78 to 11.55]; long-term suppression: RR, 2.22 [CI, 1.69 to 2.93]), much weaker for NADC caused by viruses (unsuppressed: RR, 3.82 [CI, 3.24 to 4.49]; early suppression: RR, 3.42 [CI, 2.95 to 3.97]; long-term suppression: RR, 3.17 [CI, 2.78 to 3.62]), and absent for NADC not caused by viruses.
Limitation
Lower viral suppression thresholds, duration of long-term suppression, and effects of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell counts were not thoroughly evaluated.
Conclusion
Antiretroviral therapy resulting in long-term viral suppression may contribute to cancer prevention, to a greater degree for ADC than for NADC. Patients with long-term viral suppression still had excess cancer risk.
Primary Funding Source
National Cancer Institute and National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism of the National Institutes of Health.
acpjournals.org