[PDF][PDF] A retrospective analysis of adjuvant CAF, AC-T and TAC regimens in triple negative early stage breast cancer

H Buyukhatipoglu, T Babacan, N Kertmen, O Balakan… - J BUON, 2015 - researchgate.net
H Buyukhatipoglu, T Babacan, N Kertmen, O Balakan, A Suner, O Ates, F Sarici, A Aslan…
J BUON, 2015researchgate.net
Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in triple
negative breast cancer (TNBC) for which no protocol has been determined to be treatment of
choice. Methods: In this single-center retrospective trial, we analyzed the adjuvant regimens
of 164 TNBC patients among 3253 breast cancer patient records. Adjuvant TAC (docetaxel,
doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide), CAF (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, 5fluorouracil), and
AC-T (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel) regimens were compared in …
Summary
Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) for which no protocol has been determined to be treatment of choice.
Methods: In this single-center retrospective trial, we analyzed the adjuvant regimens of 164 TNBC patients among 3253 breast cancer patient records. Adjuvant TAC (docetaxel, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide), CAF (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, 5fluorouracil), and AC-T (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel) regimens were compared in terms of disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: In terms of both DFS and OS TAC was significantly superior to AC-T in node positive TNBC. When node negative and positive patients were analyzed together, TAC was still significantly superior to AC-T in terms of DFS and OS. There was a trend favoring CAF over AC-T, however, it was only significant in terms of OS when all node negative and positive TNBC patients were incorporated together. Conclusion: In the adjuvant setting, especially in node positive patients, TAC should be the treatment of choice in TNBC patients. CAF is probably better than AC-T in TNBC.
researchgate.net