Sequence-specific error profile of Illumina sequencers

K Nakamura, T Oshima, T Morimoto… - Nucleic acids …, 2011 - academic.oup.com
K Nakamura, T Oshima, T Morimoto, S Ikeda, H Yoshikawa, Y Shiwa, S Ishikawa, MC Linak…
Nucleic acids research, 2011academic.oup.com
We identified the sequence-specific starting positions of consecutive miscalls in the mapping
of reads obtained from the Illumina Genome Analyser (GA). Detailed analysis of the miscall
pattern indicated that the underlying mechanism involves sequence-specific interference of
the base elongation process during sequencing. The two major sequence patterns that
trigger this sequence-specific error (SSE) are:(i) inverted repeats and (ii) GGC sequences.
We speculate that these sequences favor dephasing by inhibiting single-base elongation …
Abstract
We identified the sequence-specific starting positions of consecutive miscalls in the mapping of reads obtained from the Illumina Genome Analyser (GA). Detailed analysis of the miscall pattern indicated that the underlying mechanism involves sequence-specific interference of the base elongation process during sequencing. The two major sequence patterns that trigger this sequence-specific error (SSE) are: (i) inverted repeats and (ii) GGC sequences. We speculate that these sequences favor dephasing by inhibiting single-base elongation, by: (i) folding single-stranded DNA and (ii) altering enzyme preference. This phenomenon is a major cause of sequence coverage variability and of the unfavorable bias observed for population-targeted methods such as RNA-seq and ChIP-seq. Moreover, SSE is a potential cause of false single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) calls and also significantly hinders de novo assembly. This article highlights the importance of recognizing SSE and its underlying mechanisms in the hope of enhancing the potential usefulness of the Illumina sequencers.
Oxford University Press