[HTML][HTML] Protective Efficacy of Plasmodium vivax Radiation-Attenuated Sporozoites in Colombian Volunteers: A Randomized Controlled Trial

M Arévalo-Herrera, JM Vásquez-Jiménez… - PLoS neglected …, 2016 - journals.plos.org
M Arévalo-Herrera, JM Vásquez-Jiménez, M Lopez-Perez, AF Vallejo, AB Amado-Garavito…
PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2016journals.plos.org
Background Immunizing human volunteers by mosquito bite with radiation-attenuated
Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites (RAS) results in high-level protection against infection.
Only two volunteers have been similarly immunized with P. vivax (Pv) RAS, and both were
protected. A phase 2 controlled clinical trial was conducted to assess the safety and
protective efficacy of Pv RAS immunization. Methodology/Principal Findings A randomized,
single-blinded trial was conducted. Duffy positive (Fy+; Pv susceptible) individuals were …
Background
Immunizing human volunteers by mosquito bite with radiation-attenuated Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites (RAS) results in high-level protection against infection. Only two volunteers have been similarly immunized with P. vivax (Pv) RAS, and both were protected. A phase 2 controlled clinical trial was conducted to assess the safety and protective efficacy of PvRAS immunization.
Methodology/Principal Findings
A randomized, single-blinded trial was conducted. Duffy positive (Fy+; Pv susceptible) individuals were enrolled: 14 received bites from irradiated (150 ± 10 cGy) Pv-infected Anopheles mosquitoes (RAS) and 7 from non-irradiated non-infected mosquitoes (Ctl). An additional group of seven Fy- (Pv refractory) volunteers was immunized with bites from non-irradiated Pv-infected mosquitoes. A total of seven immunizations were carried out at mean intervals of nine weeks. Eight weeks after last immunization, a controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) with non-irradiated Pv-infected mosquitoes was performed. Nineteen volunteers completed seven immunizations (12 RAS, 2 Ctl, and 5 Fy-) and received a CHMI. Five of 12 (42%) RAS volunteers were protected (receiving a median of 434 infective bites) compared with 0/2 Ctl. None of the Fy- volunteers developed infection by the seventh immunization or after CHMI. All non-protected volunteers developed symptoms 8–13 days after CHMI with a mean pre-patent period of 12.8 days. No serious adverse events related to the immunizations were observed. Specific IgG1 anti-PvCS response was associated with protection.
Conclusion
Immunization with PvRAS was safe, immunogenic, and induced sterile immunity in 42% of the Fy+ volunteers. Moreover, Fy- volunteers were refractory to Pv malaria.
Trial registration
Identifier: NCT01082341.
PLOS