[HTML][HTML] MinION Sequencing of colorectal cancer tumour microbiomes—A comparison with amplicon-based and RNA-Sequencing

WS Taylor, J Pearson, A Miller, S Schmeier, FA Frizelle… - PloS one, 2020 - journals.plos.org
WS Taylor, J Pearson, A Miller, S Schmeier, FA Frizelle, RV Purcell
PloS one, 2020journals.plos.org
Background Recent evidence suggests a role for the gut microbiome in the development
and progression of many diseases and many studies have been carried out to analyse the
microbiome using a variety of methods. In this study, we compare MinION sequencing with
meta-transcriptomics and amplicon-based sequencing for microbiome analysis of colorectal
tumour tissue samples. Methods DNA and RNA were extracted from 11 colorectal tumour
samples. 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and MinION sequencing was carried out using …
Background
Recent evidence suggests a role for the gut microbiome in the development and progression of many diseases and many studies have been carried out to analyse the microbiome using a variety of methods. In this study, we compare MinION sequencing with meta-transcriptomics and amplicon-based sequencing for microbiome analysis of colorectal tumour tissue samples.
Methods
DNA and RNA were extracted from 11 colorectal tumour samples. 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and MinION sequencing was carried out using genomic DNA, and RNA-Sequencing for meta-transcriptomic analysis. Non-human MinION and RNA-Sequencing reads, and 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing reads were taxonomically classified using a database built from available RefSeq bacterial and archaeal genomes and a k-mer based algorithm in Kraken2. Concordance between the three platforms at different taxonomic levels was tested on a per-sample basis using Spearman’s rank correlation.
Results
The average number of reads per sample using RNA-Sequencing was greater than 129 times that generated using MinION sequencing. However, the average read length of MinION sequences was more than 13 times that of RNA or 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Taxonomic assignment using 16S sequencing was less reliable beyond the genus level, and both RNA-Sequencing and MinION sequencing could detect greater numbers of phyla and genera in the same samples, compared to 16S sequencing. Bacterial species associated with colorectal cancer, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Parvimonas micra, Bacteroides fragilis and Porphyromonas gingivalis, were detectable using MinION, RNA-Sequencing and 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing data.
Conclusions
Long-read sequences generated using MinION sequencing can compensate for low numbers of reads for bacterial classification. MinION sequencing can discriminate between bacterial strains and plasmids and shows potential as a cost-effective tool for rapid microbiome sequencing in a clinical setting.
PLOS