Emerging concepts in TCR specificity: rationalizing and (maybe) predicting outcomes

NK Singh, TP Riley, SCB Baker, T Borrman… - The Journal of …, 2017 - journals.aai.org
NK Singh, TP Riley, SCB Baker, T Borrman, Z Weng, BM Baker
The Journal of Immunology, 2017journals.aai.org
T cell specificity emerges from a myriad of processes, ranging from the biological pathways
that control T cell signaling to the structural and physical mechanisms that influence how
TCRs bind peptides and MHC proteins. Of these processes, the binding specificity of the
TCR is a key component. However, TCR specificity is enigmatic: TCRs are at once specific
but also cross-reactive. Although long appreciated, this duality continues to puzzle
immunologists and has implications for the development of TCR-based therapeutics. In this …
Abstract
T cell specificity emerges from a myriad of processes, ranging from the biological pathways that control T cell signaling to the structural and physical mechanisms that influence how TCRs bind peptides and MHC proteins. Of these processes, the binding specificity of the TCR is a key component. However, TCR specificity is enigmatic: TCRs are at once specific but also cross-reactive. Although long appreciated, this duality continues to puzzle immunologists and has implications for the development of TCR-based therapeutics. In this review, we discuss TCR specificity, emphasizing results that have emerged from structural and physical studies of TCR binding. We show how the TCR specificity/cross-reactivity duality can be rationalized from structural and biophysical principles. There is excellent agreement between predictions from these principles and classic predictions about the scope of TCR cross-reactivity. We demonstrate how these same principles can also explain amino acid preferences in immunogenic epitopes and highlight opportunities for structural considerations in predictive immunology.
journals.aai.org