Erlotinib, erlotinib–sulindac versus placebo: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled window trial in operable head and neck cancer

ND Gross, JE Bauman, WE Gooding, W Denq… - Clinical Cancer …, 2014 - AACR
ND Gross, JE Bauman, WE Gooding, W Denq, SM Thomas, L Wang, S Chiosea, BL Hood…
Clinical Cancer Research, 2014AACR
Abstract Purpose: The EGF receptor (EGFR) and COX2 pathways are upregulated in head
and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Preclinical models indicate synergistic
antitumor activity from dual blockade. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-
controlled window trial of erlotinib, an EGFR inhibitor; erlotinib plus sulindac, a nonselective
COX inhibitor; versus placebo. Experimental Design: Patients with untreated, operable stage
II-IVb HNSCC were randomized 5: 5: 3 to erlotinib, erlotinib–sulindac, or placebo. Tumor …
Abstract
Purpose: The EGF receptor (EGFR) and COX2 pathways are upregulated in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Preclinical models indicate synergistic antitumor activity from dual blockade. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled window trial of erlotinib, an EGFR inhibitor; erlotinib plus sulindac, a nonselective COX inhibitor; versus placebo.
Experimental Design: Patients with untreated, operable stage II-IVb HNSCC were randomized 5:5:3 to erlotinib, erlotinib–sulindac, or placebo. Tumor specimens were collected before and after seven to 14 days of treatment. The primary endpoint was change in Ki67 proliferation index. We hypothesized an ordering effect in Ki67 reduction: erlotinib–sulindac > erlotinib > placebo. We evaluated tissue microarrays by immunohistochemistry for pharmacodynamic modulation of EGFR and COX2 signaling intermediates.
Results: From 2005–2009, 47 patients were randomized for the target 39 evaluable patients. Thirty-four tumor pairs were of sufficient quality to assess biomarker modulation. Ki67 was significantly decreased by erlotinib or erlotinib–sulindac (omnibus comparison, two-sided Kruskal–Wallis, P = 0.04). Wilcoxon pairwise contrasts confirmed greater Ki67 effect in both erlotinib groups (erlotinib–sulindac vs. placebo, P = 0.043; erlotinib vs. placebo, P = 0.027). There was a significant trend in ordering of Ki67 reduction: erlotinib–sulindac > erlotinib > placebo (two-sided exact Jonckheere–Terpstra, P = 0.0185). Low baseline pSrc correlated with greater Ki67 reduction (R2 = 0.312, P = 0.024).
Conclusions: Brief treatment with erlotinib significantly decreased proliferation in HNSCC, with additive effect from sulindac. Efficacy studies of dual EGFR–COX inhibition are justified. pSrc is a potential resistance biomarker for anti-EGFR therapy, and warrants investigation as a molecular target. Clin Cancer Res; 20(12); 3289–98. ©2014 AACR.
AACR