Quantitative review of antibody response to inactivated seasonal influenza vaccines

JC Seidman, SA Richard, C Viboud… - Influenza and other …, 2012 - Wiley Online Library
JC Seidman, SA Richard, C Viboud, MA Miller
Influenza and other respiratory viruses, 2012Wiley Online Library
Please cite this paper as: Seidman et al.(2012) Quantitative review of antibody response to
inactivated seasonal influenza vaccines. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 6 (1), 52–
62. Background Seasonal influenza epidemics are associated with significant morbidity and
mortality each year, particularly amongst young children and the elderly. Seasonal influenza
vaccines have been available for decades, yet influenza remains a major public health
threat in the US, sparking interest in studies evaluating the effectiveness of vaccination …
Please cite this paper as: Seidman et al. (2012) Quantitative review of antibody response to inactivated seasonal influenza vaccines. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 6(1), 52–62.
Background  Seasonal influenza epidemics are associated with significant morbidity and mortality each year, particularly amongst young children and the elderly. Seasonal influenza vaccines have been available for decades, yet influenza remains a major public health threat in the US, sparking interest in studies evaluating the effectiveness of vaccination.
Objectives  We sought to identify determinants of serological responses to inactivated seasonal influenza vaccines including number of doses, adjuvant, and subject characteristics.
Methods  We reviewed 60 articles published between 1987 and 2006. We used weighted multiple logistic regression and random‐effects models to evaluate how seroconversion and seroprotection rates varied with host and vaccine factors.
Results  Both children and seniors tended to have poorer immune responses compared to adults whereas use of adjuvant and a second vaccine dose tended to improve immune response. Pre‐vaccination serological status had a large impact on the immune response to vaccination. We found substantial heterogeneity among studies, even with similar population settings and vaccination regimen.
Conclusions  Future studies should stratify their results by pre‐vaccination serological status in an effort to produce more precise summary estimates of vaccine response.
Wiley Online Library