Gene therapy for Angelman Syndrome: contemporary approaches and future endeavors

C Tsagkaris, V Papakosta, AV Miranda… - Current Gene …, 2019 - ingentaconnect.com
C Tsagkaris, V Papakosta, AV Miranda, L Zacharopoulou, V Danilchenko, L Matiashova…
Current Gene Therapy, 2019ingentaconnect.com
Background: Angelman Syndrome (AS) is a congenital non inherited neurodevelopmental
disorder. The contemporary AS management is symptomatic and it has been accepted that
gene therapy may play a key role in the treatment of AS. Objective: The purpose of this study
is to summarize existing and suggested gene therapy approaches to Angelman syndrome.
Methods: This is a literature review. Pubmed and Scopus databases were researched with
keywords (gene therapy, Angelman's syndrome, neurological disorders, neonates). Peer …
Background
Angelman Syndrome (AS) is a congenital non inherited neurodevelopmental disorder. The contemporary AS management is symptomatic and it has been accepted that gene therapy may play a key role in the treatment of AS.
Objective
The purpose of this study is to summarize existing and suggested gene therapy approaches to Angelman syndrome.
Methods
This is a literature review. Pubmed and Scopus databases were researched with keywords (gene therapy, Angelman’s syndrome, neurological disorders, neonates). Peer-reviewed studies that were closely related to gene therapies in Angelman syndrome and available in English, Greek, Ukrainian or Indonesian were included. Studies that were published before 2000 were excluded and did not align with the aforementioned criteria.
Results
UBE3A serves multiple roles in signaling and degradation procedures. Although the restoration of UBE3A expression rather than targeting known activities of the molecule would be the optimal therapeutic goal, it is not possible so far. Reinstatement of paternal UBE3A appears as an adequate alternative. This can be achieved by administering topoisomerase-I inhibitors or reducing UBE3A antisense transcript (UBE3A-ATS), a molecule which silences paternal UBE3A.
Conclusion
Understanding UBE3A imprinting unravels the path to an etiologic treatment of AS. Gene therapy models tested on mice appeared less effective than anticipated pointing out that activation of paternal UBE3A cannot counteract the existing CNS defects. On the other hand, targeting abnormal downstream cell signaling pathways has provided promising rescue effects. Perhaps, combined reinstatement of paternal UBE3A expression with abnormal signaling pathways-oriented treatment is expected to provide better therapeutic effects. However, AS gene therapy remains debatable in pharmacoeconomics and ethics context.
ingentaconnect.com