Neighborhood disadvantage and life‐space mobility are associated with incident falls in community‐dwelling older adults

AX Lo, AG Rundle, D Buys, RE Kennedy… - Journal of the …, 2016 - Wiley Online Library
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2016Wiley Online Library
Objectives To determine the relationship between neighborhood‐level socioeconomic
characteristics, life‐space mobility, and incident falls in community‐dwelling older adults.
Design Prospective, observational cohort study with a baseline in‐home assessment and 6‐
month telephone follow‐up. Setting Central Alabama. Participants Community‐dwelling
adults aged 65 and older recruited from a random sample of Medicare beneficiaries (N=
1,000). Measurements Neighborhood disadvantage was measured using a composite index …
Objectives
To determine the relationship between neighborhood‐level socioeconomic characteristics, life‐space mobility, and incident falls in community‐dwelling older adults.
Design
Prospective, observational cohort study with a baseline in‐home assessment and 6‐month telephone follow‐up.
Setting
Central Alabama.
Participants
Community‐dwelling adults aged 65 and older recruited from a random sample of Medicare beneficiaries (N = 1,000).
Measurements
Neighborhood disadvantage was measured using a composite index derived from baseline neighborhood‐level residential census tract socioeconomic variables. Data on individual‐level socioeconomic characteristics, clinical variables, and life‐space collected at baseline were included as covariates in a multivariate model using generalized estimating equations to assess the association with incident falls in the 6 months after baseline.
Results
Of the 940 participants who completed baseline and follow‐up assessments, 126 (13%) reported one or more new falls in the 6 months after baseline. There was an independent nonlinear association between neighborhood disadvantage (according to increasing quartiles of disadvantage) and incident falls after adjusting for confounders: The lowest quartile served as reference; 2nd quartile odds ratio (OR) = 2.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2–4.6; 3rd quartile OR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.0–3.7; 4th quartile OR = 3.2, 95% CI = 1.7–6.0. Each 10‐point decrement in life‐space (OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.0–1.3) was associated with a higher risk of falls.
Conclusion
Greater neighborhood disadvantage was associated with greater risk of falls. Life‐space also contributes separately to fall risk. Community‐dwelling older adults in disadvantaged neighborhoods, particularly those with limited mobility, may benefit from a more‐rigorous assessment of their fall risk by healthcare providers. Neighborhood level socioeconomic characteristics should also be an important consideration when identifying vulnerable populations that may benefit the most from fall prevention programs.
Wiley Online Library