Subphenotypes in acute respiratory distress syndrome: latent class analysis of data from two randomised controlled trials

CS Calfee, K Delucchi, PE Parsons… - The Lancet …, 2014 - thelancet.com
CS Calfee, K Delucchi, PE Parsons, BT Thompson, LB Ware, MA Matthay
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 2014thelancet.com
Background Subphenotypes have been identified within heterogeneous diseases such as
asthma and breast cancer, with important therapeutic implications. We assessed whether
subphenotypes exist within acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), another
heterogeneous disorder. Methods We used data from two ARDS randomised controlled
trials (ARMA trial and ALVEOLI trial), sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood
Institute. We applied latent class modelling to identify subphenotypes using clinical and …
Background
Subphenotypes have been identified within heterogeneous diseases such as asthma and breast cancer, with important therapeutic implications. We assessed whether subphenotypes exist within acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), another heterogeneous disorder.
Methods
We used data from two ARDS randomised controlled trials (ARMA trial and ALVEOLI trial), sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. We applied latent class modelling to identify subphenotypes using clinical and biological data. We modelled data from both studies independently. We then tested the association of subphenotypes with clinical outcomes in both cohorts and with the response to positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in the ALVEOLI cohort.
Findings
We analysed data for 1022 patients: 473 in the ARMA cohort and 549 in the ALVEOLI cohort. Independent latent class models indicated that a two-class (ie, two subphenotype) model was the best fit for both cohorts. In both cohorts, we identified a hyperinflammatory subphenotype (phenotype 2) that was characterised by higher plasma concentrations of inflammatory biomarkers, a higher prevalence of vasopressor use, lower serum bicarbonate concentrations, and a higher prevalence of sepsis than phenotype 1. Participants in phenotype 2 had higher mortality and fewer ventilator-free days and organ failure-free days in both cohorts than did those in phenotype 1 (p<0·007 for all). In the ALVEOLI cohort, the effects of ventilation strategy (high PEEP vs low PEEP) on mortality, ventilator-free days and organ failure-free days differed by phenotype (p=0·049 for mortality, p=0·018 for ventilator-free days, p=0·003 for organ-failure-free days).
Interpretation
We have identified two subphenotypes within ARDS, one of which is categorised by more severe inflammation, shock, and metabolic acidosis and by worse clinical outcomes. Response to treatment in a randomised trial of PEEP strategies differed on the basis of subphenotype. Identification of ARDS subphenotypes might be useful in selecting patients for future clinical trials.
Funding
National Institutes of Health.
thelancet.com